WTA 250 · Semifinals · Linz
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Friedsam
💥 Big Hitter
Larsson
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 64% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 2,716 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Anna Lena Friedsam here.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Friedsam | Larsson |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 3–2 | - |
| Avg odds | 1.45 | - |
| ROI % | -29.4% | - |
| Units P/L | -1.47u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
2
Friedsam
1
Larsson
May 16, 2016
Nurnberg
C Clay · Round of 32
Oct 12, 2015
Linz
H Hard · Semifinals
Jul 13, 2015
Bastad
C Clay · Round of 16
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Friedsam | Larsson |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 72.4% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 58% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 50.5% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 2 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 4 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 48.1% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 35.6% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 52.2% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 28.6% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 47.5% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Anna Lena Friedsam and Johanna Larsson face off in the Semifinals at Linz on Hard.
Anna Lena Friedsam leads 2-1 over 3 previous meetings.
Anna Lena Friedsam is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Clervie Ngounoue (Jun 23).
Johanna Larsson is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Magda Linette (Feb 8).
Share this match
