WTA 250 · Round of 32 · Nurnberg
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Friedsam
💥 Big Hitter
Begu
🎯 Baseliner
Matchup analysis
💥 Big Hitter vs 🎯 Baseliner is historically tight (51% vs 49%, 1,030 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Anna Lena Friedsam plays Irina Camelia Begu.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Friedsam | Begu |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 3–2 | 3–2 |
| Avg odds | 1.45 | 2.89 |
| ROI % | -29.4% | +40.4% |
| Units P/L | -1.47u | +2.02u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Friedsam
0
Begu
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Begu has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Friedsam's 0%).
| Opponent | Friedsam | Begu |
|---|---|---|
| Anna Siskova | L 16 26 | W 62 36 75 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Friedsam | Begu |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 72.4% | 74.5% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 58% | 44.7% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 50.5% | 23.1% |
| Aces / Match | 2 | 1 |
| Double Faults / Match | 4 | 1 |
| Break Points Saved % | 48.1% | 45.5% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 35.6% | 36.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 52.2% | 50% |
| BP Converted % | 28.6% | 66.7% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 47.5% | 38.5% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 69% | 33% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Anna Lena Friedsam and Irina Camelia Begu face off in the Round of 32 at Nurnberg on Clay.
Anna Lena Friedsam leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Anna Lena Friedsam is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Clervie Ngounoue (Jun 23).
Irina Camelia Begu is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Karolina Muchova (Jun 24).
Share this match
