WTA 1000 · Round of 64 · Rome
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Friedsam
💥 Big Hitter
Schmiedlova
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 64% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 2,716 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Anna Lena Friedsam here.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Friedsam | Schmiedlova |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 3–2 | - |
| Avg odds | 1.45 | - |
| ROI % | -29.4% | - |
| Units P/L | -1.47u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Friedsam
0
Schmiedlova
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Friedsam | Schmiedlova |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 72.4% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 58% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 50.5% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 2 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 4 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 48.1% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 35.6% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 52.2% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 28.6% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 47.5% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 69% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Anna Lena Friedsam and Anna Karolina Schmiedlova face off in the Round of 64 at Rome on Clay.
Anna Lena Friedsam leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Anna Lena Friedsam is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Clervie Ngounoue (Jun 23).
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Marina Stakusic (Sep 9).
Share this match
