WTA 250 · Round of 32 · Cluj-Napoca 1
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Schmiedlova
⚙️ Grinder
Hruncakova
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 64% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 2,716 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Viktoria Hruncakova here.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Schmiedlova | Hruncakova |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 5–5 |
| Avg odds | - | 1.88 |
| ROI % | - | -24.3% |
| Units P/L | - | -2.43u |
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Schmiedlova
0
Hruncakova
Aug 2, 2021
Cluj-Napoca 1
C Clay · Round of 32
Apr 29, 2019
Prague
C Clay · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Schmiedlova | Hruncakova |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 63.1% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 64.8% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 42.5% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 4.6 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 3.2 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 62% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 36.1% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 63.4% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 47.8% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 52.1% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 50% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova and Viktoria Hruncakova face off in the Round of 32 at Cluj-Napoca 1 on Clay.
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Marina Stakusic (Sep 9).
Viktoria Hruncakova is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Rebecca Sramkova (Jun 23).
Share this match
