WTA Finals · Round of 32 · Parma
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Schmiedlova
⚙️ Grinder
Williams
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 60% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 1,639 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Venus Williams here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Schmiedlova | Williams |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 0–2 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.82 |
| ROI % | - | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | - | -2.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
3
Schmiedlova
0
Williams
May 17, 2021
Parma
C Clay · Round of 32
Sep 28, 2020
Roland Garros
C Clay · Round of 128
Mar 2, 2020
Monterrey
H Hard · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Schmiedlova | Williams |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 56.5% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 64.1% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 26.7% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 3 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 54.5% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 36.4% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 40% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 50% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 43.4% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova and Venus Williams face off in the Round of 32 at Parma on Clay.
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova leads 3-0 over 3 previous meetings.
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Marina Stakusic (Sep 9).
Venus Williams is 0-5 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Irina Camelia Begu (Jun 22).
Share this match
