WTA 250 · Round of 16 · Tashkent
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Schmiedlova
⚙️ Grinder
Hibino
🪃 Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
The 🪃 Counterpuncher archetype wins about 64% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 2,848 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Nao Hibino here.
Counterpuncher players often use elite bp conversion and strong return game to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Schmiedlova | Hibino |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 5–7 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.01 |
| ROI % | - | -36.1% |
| Units P/L | - | -4.33u |
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Schmiedlova
0
Hibino
Mar 8, 2021
Guadalajara
H Hard · Round of 32
Sep 24, 2018
Tashkent
H Hard · Round of 16
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Schmiedlova | Hibino |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 69% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 54% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 38.4% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 1.2 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 2.5 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 51.8% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 37% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 59% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 40% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 45.9% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 25% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova and Nao Hibino face off in the Round of 16 at Tashkent on Hard.
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Marina Stakusic (Sep 9).
Nao Hibino is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Darja Semenistaja (Jun 24).
Share this match
