WTA 250 · Quarterfinals · Seoul
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Schmiedlova
⚙️ Grinder
Barthel
👑 The Complete Package
Matchup analysis
The 👑 The Complete Package archetype wins about 67% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 1,444 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Mona Barthel here.
The Complete Package players often use elite serve & return and high bp conversion to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Schmiedlova | Barthel |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 3–2 |
| Avg odds | - | 1.76 |
| ROI % | - | -23.8% |
| Units P/L | - | -1.19u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Schmiedlova
0
Barthel
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Schmiedlova | Barthel |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 57.3% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 71.8% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 44% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 4.4 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 8.6 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 51% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 40.5% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 61.5% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 50.8% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 54.6% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 100% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova and Mona Barthel face off in the Quarterfinals at Seoul on Hard.
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Marina Stakusic (Sep 9).
Mona Barthel is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Hanne Vandewinkel (Jun 6).
Share this match
