WTA 1000 · Round of 16 · Wuhan
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Schmiedlova
⚙️ Grinder
Mladenovic
🏃 Pusher
Matchup analysis
The ⚙️ Grinder archetype wins about 63% vs 🏃 Pusher across 1,284 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Anna Karolina Schmiedlova here.
Grinder players often use relentless consistency and deep court positioning to pressure the pusher's extreme retrieval. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Schmiedlova | Mladenovic |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 0–1 |
| Avg odds | - | 1.35 |
| ROI % | - | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | - | -1.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
1
Schmiedlova
2
Mladenovic
May 31, 2021
Roland Garros
C Clay · Round of 128
Jul 2, 2018
Wimbledon
G Grass · Round of 128
Sep 28, 2015
Wuhan
H Hard · Round of 16
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Schmiedlova | Mladenovic |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova and Kristina Mladenovic face off in the Round of 16 at Wuhan on Hard.
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova leads 1-2 over 3 previous meetings.
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Marina Stakusic (Sep 9).
Kristina Mladenovic is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Valentina Ryser (Jun 16).
Share this match
