WTA 250 · Round of 32 · Istanbul
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Schmiedlova
⚙️ Grinder
Juvan
🏹 Frontrunner
Matchup analysis
The 🏹 Frontrunner archetype wins about 62% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 458 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Kaja Juvan here.
Frontrunner players often use fast starts and aggressive openers to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Schmiedlova | Juvan |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 0–1 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.30 |
| ROI % | - | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | - | -1.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
3
Schmiedlova
0
Juvan
Oct 18, 2021
Tenerife
H Hard · Round of 32
Aug 2, 2021
Cluj-Napoca 1
C Clay · Round of 16
Sep 7, 2020
Istanbul
C Clay · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Schmiedlova | Juvan |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 50% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova and Kaja Juvan face off in the Round of 32 at Istanbul on Clay.
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova leads 3-0 over 3 previous meetings.
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Marina Stakusic (Sep 9).
Kaja Juvan is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Antonia Ruzic (Jun 13).
Share this match
