WTA 250 · Round of 32 · Prague
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Schmiedlova
⚙️ Grinder
Watson
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 60% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 1,639 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Heather Watson here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Schmiedlova | Watson |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 3–2 |
| Avg odds | - | 1.87 |
| ROI % | - | +9.6% |
| Units P/L | - | +0.48u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Schmiedlova
0
Watson
Feb 7, 2020
Fed Cup QLS R1: GBR vs SVK
C Clay · Round Robin
Apr 30, 2018
Prague
C Clay · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Schmiedlova | Watson |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 60% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 57.6% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 50% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 1 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 2 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 33.3% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 37.2% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 44.4% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 25% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 45.9% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova and Heather Watson face off in the Round of 32 at Prague on Clay.
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Marina Stakusic (Sep 9).
Heather Watson is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Maria Timofeeva (Jun 25).
Share this match
