WTA 250 · Round of 16 · Cluj-Napoca 2
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Kalinina
🎾 All-Court
Friedsam
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 55% vs 🎾 All-Court across 1,018 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Anna Lena Friedsam here.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the all-court's tactical versatility. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Kalinina | Friedsam |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 8–7 | 3–2 |
| Avg odds | 1.70 | 1.45 |
| ROI % | -18.2% | -29.4% |
| Units P/L | -2.73u | -1.47u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
1
Kalinina
1
Friedsam
Feb 6, 2023
Linz
H Hard · Round of 16
Oct 25, 2021
Cluj-Napoca 2
H Hard · Round of 16
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Kalinina | Friedsam |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 69.9% | 72.4% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 60.7% | 58% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 51.8% | 50.5% |
| Aces / Match | 1.1 | 2 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.9 | 4 |
| Break Points Saved % | 48.7% | 48.1% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 45.9% | 35.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 58.6% | 52.2% |
| BP Converted % | 47.3% | 28.6% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 53.4% | 47.5% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Anhelina Kalinina and Anna Lena Friedsam face off in the Round of 16 at Cluj-Napoca 2 on Hard.
Anhelina Kalinina leads 1-1 over 2 previous meetings.
Anhelina Kalinina is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Mccartney Kessler (Jun 24).
Anna Lena Friedsam is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Clervie Ngounoue (Jun 23).
Share this match
