WTA 250 · Round of 32 · Nuremberg
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Kerber
🏹 Frontrunner
Peterson
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
🏹 Frontrunner vs 💥 Big Hitter is historically tight (49% vs 51%, 1,273 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Angelique Kerber plays Rebecca Peterson.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Kerber | Peterson |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 1–2 |
| Avg odds | - | 1.29 |
| ROI % | - | -56.0% |
| Units P/L | - | -1.68u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Kerber
0
Peterson
Jun 24, 2019
Eastbourne
G Grass · Round of 16
May 18, 2015
Nuremberg
C Clay · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Kerber | Peterson |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 61.7% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 58.7% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 39.3% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 1.7 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 9 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 52.5% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 37.8% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 68.1% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 53% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 48.5% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 33% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Angelique Kerber and Rebecca Peterson face off in the Round of 32 at Nuremberg on Clay.
Angelique Kerber leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Angelique Kerber is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Qinwen Zheng (Jul 29).
Rebecca Peterson is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Irina Fetecau (May 11).
Share this match
