WTA 250 Β· Round of 32 Β· Nuremberg
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Kerber
πΉ Frontrunner
Peterson
π₯ Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
πΉ Frontrunner vs π₯ Big Hitter is historically tight (49% vs 51%, 1,273 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Angelique Kerber plays Rebecca Peterson.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days
| Metric | Kerber | Peterson |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 1β2 |
| Avg odds | - | 1.29 |
| ROI % | - | -56.0% |
| Units P/L | - | -1.68u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores Β· 2 career meetings
2
Kerber
0
Peterson
Jun 24, 2019
Eastbourne
G Grass Β· Round of 16
May 18, 2015
Nuremberg
C Clay Β· Round of 32
Serve and return comparison Β· Last 90 days
| Stat | Kerber | Peterson |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 61.7% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 58.7% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 39.3% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 1.7 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 9 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 52.5% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 37.8% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 68.1% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 53% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 48.5% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 33% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Angelique Kerber and Rebecca Peterson face off in the Round of 32 at Nuremberg on Clay.
Angelique Kerber leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Angelique Kerber is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Qinwen Zheng (Jul 29).
Rebecca Peterson is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Irina Fetecau (May 11).
Share this match