WTA 1000 · Round of 32 · Rome
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Kerber
🏹 Frontrunner
Begu
🏹 Frontrunner
Matchup analysis
Both Angelique Kerber and Irina Camelia Begu are 🏹 Frontrunner types. Mirror matchups usually come down to execution, fitness, and surface fit. Across 386 matches in our dataset, the historical split is about even.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Kerber | Begu |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 2–1 |
| Avg odds | - | 1.59 |
| ROI % | - | +6.0% |
| Units P/L | - | +0.18u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 6 career meetings
4
Kerber
2
Begu
May 14, 2018
Rome
C Clay · Round of 32
Apr 16, 2016
Fed Cup WG R1: GER vs ROU
C Clay · Round Robin
Apr 4, 2016
Charleston
C Clay · Quarterfinals
May 11, 2015
Rome
C Clay · Round of 32
Apr 6, 2015
Charleston
C Clay · Quarterfinals
Jan 19, 2015
Australian Open
H Hard · Round of 128
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Kerber | Begu |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 74.5% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 44.7% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 23.1% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 1 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 1 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 45.5% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 36.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 50% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 66.7% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 38.5% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 33% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Angelique Kerber and Irina Camelia Begu face off in the Round of 32 at Rome on Clay.
Angelique Kerber leads 4-2 over 6 previous meetings.
Angelique Kerber is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Qinwen Zheng (Jul 29).
Irina Camelia Begu is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Diane Parry (Jun 21).
Share this match
