WTA 1000 · Round of 32 · Beijing
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Kontaveit
💥 Big Hitter
Siegemund
🏹 Frontrunner
Matchup analysis
💥 Big Hitter vs 🏹 Frontrunner is historically tight (51% vs 49%, 1,273 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Anett Kontaveit plays Laura Siegemund.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Kontaveit | Siegemund |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 5–8 |
| Avg odds | - | 3.26 |
| ROI % | - | -33.0% |
| Units P/L | - | -4.29u |
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Kontaveit
0
Siegemund
Aug 3, 2020
Palermo
C Clay · Round of 16
Oct 1, 2018
Beijing
H Hard · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Kontaveit | Siegemund |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 75.7% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 55.7% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 45.6% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 1.3 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 2.1 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 57.1% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 38.2% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 60.8% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 52.1% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 50.1% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Anett Kontaveit and Laura Siegemund face off in the Round of 32 at Beijing on Hard.
Anett Kontaveit leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Anett Kontaveit is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Lucrezia Stefanini (Jul 3).
Laura Siegemund is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Sara Bejlek (Jun 23).
Share this match
