ATP Challenger Tour · Quarterfinals · Quimper
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Rublev
🤖 Servebot
Lamasine
🪃 Counterpuncher
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 58% vs 🪃 Counterpuncher across 4,477 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Andrey Rublev here.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Rublev | Lamasine |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 11–6 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.22 | - |
| ROI % | -7.8% | - |
| Units P/L | -1.33u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Rublev
0
Lamasine
Feb 3, 2017
Quimper
H Hard · Quarterfinals
Nov 11, 2016
Mouilleron Le Captif
H Hard · Quarterfinals
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Rublev | Lamasine |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 63% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 70.1% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 53.7% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 4.9 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 2.2 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 58.5% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 32.6% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 53.1% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 41.4% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 20 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 19.9 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 64.3% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 52.1% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Andrey Rublev and Tristan Lamasine face off in the Quarterfinals at Quimper on Hard.
Andrey Rublev leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Andrey Rublev is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Hubert Hurkacz (Jun 16).
Tristan Lamasine is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Marat Sharipov (Jul 14).
Share this match
