WTA 1000 Β· Quarterfinals Β· Beijing
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Sevastova
π― Baseliner
Cibulkova
π― Baseliner
Matchup analysis
Both Anastasija Sevastova and Dominika Cibulkova are π― Baseliner types. Mirror matchups usually come down to execution, fitness, and surface fit. Across 246 matches in our dataset, the historical split is about even.
Prior meetings and scores Β· 2 career meetings
1
Sevastova
1
Cibulkova
Oct 1, 2018
Beijing
H Hard Β· Quarterfinals
Jan 8, 2018
Sydney
H Hard Β· Round of 32
Serve and return comparison Β· Last 90 days
| Stat | Sevastova | Cibulkova |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Anastasija Sevastova and Dominika Cibulkova face off in the Quarterfinals at Beijing on Hard.
Anastasija Sevastova leads 1-1 over 2 previous meetings.
Anastasija Sevastova is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Aliona Falei (Nov 24).
Dominika Cibulkova is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Aryna Sabalenka (May 27).
Share this match