WTA 1000 · Round of 64 · Rome
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Anisimova
👑 The Complete Package
Wang
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
The 👑 The Complete Package archetype wins about 56% vs 💥 Big Hitter across 4,219 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Amanda Anisimova here.
The Complete Package players often use elite serve & return and high bp conversion to pressure the big hitter's power groundstrokes. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Anisimova | Wang |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 1–3 | - |
| Avg odds | 1.91 | - |
| ROI % | -10.3% | - |
| Units P/L | -0.41u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 3 career meetings
3
Anisimova
0
Wang
May 10, 2021
Rome
C Clay · Round of 64
Jul 30, 2018
San Jose
H Hard · Round of 32
Mar 19, 2018
Miami
H Hard · Round of 128
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Anisimova | Wang |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 33% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Amanda Anisimova and Qiang Wang face off in the Round of 64 at Rome on Clay.
Amanda Anisimova leads 3-0 over 3 previous meetings.
Amanda Anisimova is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Iva Jovic (Jun 12).
Qiang Wang is 0-5 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Jiaqi Wang (Oct 6).
Share this match
