WTA 250 · Round of 16 · Auckland
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Anisimova
👑 The Complete Package
Strycova
🎯 Baseliner
Matchup analysis
The 👑 The Complete Package archetype wins about 61% vs 🎯 Baseliner across 495 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Amanda Anisimova here.
The Complete Package players often use elite serve & return and high bp conversion to pressure the baseliner's precise groundstrokes. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Anisimova | Strycova |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 1–3 | - |
| Avg odds | 1.91 | - |
| ROI % | -10.3% | - |
| Units P/L | -0.41u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
1
Anisimova
1
Strycova
Feb 17, 2020
Dubai
H Hard · Round of 32
Dec 31, 2018
Auckland
H Hard · Round of 16
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Anisimova | Strycova |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Amanda Anisimova and Barbora Strycova face off in the Round of 16 at Auckland on Hard.
Amanda Anisimova leads 1-1 over 2 previous meetings.
Amanda Anisimova is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Iva Jovic (Jun 12).
Barbora Strycova is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Kaia Kanepi (Aug 28).
Share this match
