WTA Finals · Round of 16 · Parma
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Anisimova
👑 The Complete Package
Schmiedlova
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The 👑 The Complete Package archetype wins about 67% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 1,444 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Amanda Anisimova here.
The Complete Package players often use elite serve & return and high bp conversion to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Anisimova | Schmiedlova |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 1–3 | - |
| Avg odds | 1.91 | - |
| ROI % | -10.3% | - |
| Units P/L | -0.41u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Anisimova
0
Schmiedlova
May 17, 2021
Parma
C Clay · Round of 16
Sep 10, 2018
Hiroshima
H Hard · Quarterfinals
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Anisimova | Schmiedlova |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 33% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Amanda Anisimova and Anna Karolina Schmiedlova face off in the Round of 16 at Parma on Clay.
Amanda Anisimova leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Amanda Anisimova is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Iva Jovic (Jun 12).
Anna Karolina Schmiedlova is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Marina Stakusic (Sep 9).
Share this match
