WTA 500 · Round of 32 · Charleston 1
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Cornet
⚙️ Grinder
Mertens
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 64% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 2,716 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Elise Mertens here.
Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Cornet | Mertens |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 9–6 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.44 |
| ROI % | - | +55.6% |
| Units P/L | - | +8.34u |
Prior meetings and scores · 5 career meetings
2
Cornet
3
Mertens
Oct 3, 2022
Monastir
H Hard · Final
Feb 7, 2022
St. Petersburg
H Hard · Round of 32
Apr 5, 2021
Charleston 1
C Clay · Round of 32
Feb 9, 2019
Fed Cup WG R1: FRA vs BEL
H Hard · Round Robin
Jan 15, 2018
Australian Open
H Hard · Round of 32
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Cornet | Mertens |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 62% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 68.6% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 47.9% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 4.1 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 3.7 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 58.5% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 39.8% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 54.6% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 45.5% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 52.6% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 0% | 58% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Alize Cornet and Elise Mertens face off in the Round of 32 at Charleston 1 on Clay.
Alize Cornet leads 2-3 over 5 previous meetings.
Alize Cornet is 0-5 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Marie Bouzkova (May 18).
Elise Mertens is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Nikola Bartunkova (Jun 17).
Share this match
