WTA 250 · Paris WTA
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Charaeva
🪃 Counterpuncher
Sasnovich
🎾 All-Court
Matchup analysis
🪃 Counterpuncher vs 🎾 All-Court is historically tight (51% vs 49%, 916 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Alina Charaeva plays Aliaksandra Sasnovich.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Charaeva | Sasnovich |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 1–3 | 0–2 |
| Avg odds | 2.58 | 1.49 |
| ROI % | -66.0% | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | -2.64u | -2.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Charaeva
0
Sasnovich
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Sasnovich has a higher win rate against shared opponents (50% vs Charaeva's 0%).
| Opponent | Charaeva | Sasnovich |
|---|---|---|
| Alexandra Eala | L | L 62 46 67 |
| Janice Tjen | L 46 26 | W 67 75 61 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Charaeva | Sasnovich |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 57.7% | 64.3% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 57.6% | 64.7% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 33.7% | 33.2% |
| Aces / Match | 2 | 2 |
| Double Faults / Match | 6.5 | 5 |
| Break Points Saved % | 39.6% | 54% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 35.5% | 27.4% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 46.1% | 57.6% |
| BP Converted % | 48.6% | 40.3% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 43% | 45.3% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 50% | 50% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Alina Charaeva and Aliaksandra Sasnovich face off in the match at Paris WTA on Clay.
Alina Charaeva leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Alina Charaeva is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Alexandra Eala (Jun 4).
Aliaksandra Sasnovich is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Marina Bassols Ribera (May 22).
Share this match
