WTA 250 · Round of 32 · Moscow
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Sasnovich
🎾 All-Court
Larsson
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The 🎾 All-Court archetype wins about 68% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 437 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Aliaksandra Sasnovich here.
All-Court players often use tactical versatility and net approach ability to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency. On Clay, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Sasnovich | Larsson |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 2–4 | - |
| Avg odds | 1.81 | - |
| ROI % | -57.7% | - |
| Units P/L | -3.46u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Sasnovich
0
Larsson
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Sasnovich | Larsson |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 66.7% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 63.4% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 31.3% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 2.5 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 4.5 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 46.5% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 26% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 60.8% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 43.8% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 44.5% | 0% |
| Surface (Clay) | ||
| Clay Win % | 50% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Aliaksandra Sasnovich and Johanna Larsson face off in the Round of 32 at Moscow on Clay.
Aliaksandra Sasnovich leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Aliaksandra Sasnovich is 2-3 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Bianca Andreescu (Jun 25).
Johanna Larsson is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Magda Linette (Feb 8).
Share this match
