ATP Challenger Tour · Round of 32 · Winnipeg
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Rybakov
🪃 Counterpuncher
Muamba
🎯 Baseliner
Matchup analysis
The 🎯 Baseliner archetype wins about 53% vs 🪃 Counterpuncher across 1,829 matches in our dataset. That is a small stylistic lean for Nicaise Muamba here.
Baseliner players often use precise groundstrokes and court control to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion. On Hard, that can swing with conditions.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Rybakov | Muamba |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 6–5 | - |
| Avg odds | 1.92 | - |
| ROI % | -2.9% | - |
| Units P/L | -0.32u | - |
Prior meetings and scores · 1 career meeting
1
Rybakov
0
Muamba
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Rybakov has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Muamba's 0%).
| Opponent | Rybakov | Muamba |
|---|---|---|
| Alan Magadan | W 46 62 61 | L 26 46 |
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Rybakov | Muamba |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 66.4% | 0% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 70.8% | 0% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 45.7% | 0% |
| Aces / Match | 3.5 | 0 |
| Double Faults / Match | 3.9 | 0 |
| Break Points Saved % | 55.8% | 0% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 34.3% | 0% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 54.7% | 0% |
| BP Converted % | 54.4% | 0% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 52.3% | 0% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Alex Rybakov and Nicaise Muamba face off in the Round of 32 at Winnipeg on Hard.
Alex Rybakov leads 1-0 over 1 previous meeting.
Alex Rybakov is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Bruno Kuzuhara (Jun 17).
Nicaise Muamba is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Alvin Nicholas Tudorica (Mar 9).
Share this match
