WTA 500 · Semifinals · Tianjin
Final score
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Radwanska
🪃 Counterpuncher
Pliskova
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
🪃 Counterpuncher vs 💥 Big Hitter is historically tight (52% vs 48%, 1,074 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Agnieszka Radwanska plays Karolina Pliskova.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Radwanska | Pliskova |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 5–0 |
| Avg odds | - | 1.87 |
| ROI % | - | +86.6% |
| Units P/L | - | +4.33u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 6 career meetings
5
Radwanska
1
Pliskova
Aug 13, 2018
Cincinnati
H Hard · Round of 64
Oct 24, 2016
Singapore
H Hard · Round Robin
Apr 18, 2016
Stuttgart
C Clay · Quarterfinals
Oct 12, 2015
Tianjin
H Hard · Semifinals
Sep 21, 2015
Tokyo
H Hard · Quarterfinals
Jun 22, 2015
Eastbourne
G Grass · Round of 16
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Radwanska | Pliskova |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 65.7% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 68.2% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 41.7% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 4.1 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 5.8 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 51.1% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 35% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 53.1% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 50.5% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 50.6% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Agnieszka Radwanska and Karolina Pliskova face off in the Semifinals at Tianjin on Hard.
Agnieszka Radwanska leads 5-1 over 6 previous meetings.
Agnieszka Radwanska is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Bethanie Mattek Sands (Sep 17).
Karolina Pliskova is 4-1 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Jaqueline Cristian (May 5).
Share this match
