WTA 250 · Semifinals · Shenzhen
Final score & match stats
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Radwanska
🏹 Frontrunner
Friedsam
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
🏹 Frontrunner vs 💥 Big Hitter is historically tight (49% vs 51%, 1,273 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and H2H matter most when Agnieszka Radwanska plays Anna Lena Friedsam.
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Radwanska | Friedsam |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 3–2 |
| Avg odds | - | 1.45 |
| ROI % | - | -29.4% |
| Units P/L | - | -1.47u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Prior meetings and scores · 2 career meetings
2
Radwanska
0
Friedsam
Jan 18, 2016
Australian Open
H Hard · Round of 16
Jan 4, 2016
Shenzhen
H Hard · Semifinals
Serve and return comparison · Last 90 days
| Stat | Radwanska | Friedsam |
|---|---|---|
| Serve | ||
| 1st Serve In % | 0% | 72.4% |
| 1st Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 58% |
| 2nd Serve Pts Won % | 0% | 50.5% |
| Aces / Match | 0 | 2 |
| Double Faults / Match | 0 | 4 |
| Break Points Saved % | 0% | 48.1% |
| Return | ||
| 1st Return Pts Won % | 0% | 35.6% |
| 2nd Return Pts Won % | 0% | 52.2% |
| BP Converted % | 0% | 28.6% |
| Rally | ||
| Winners / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Unforced Errors / Match | 0 | 0 |
| Net Pts Won % | 0% | 0% |
| Total Pts Won % | 0% | 47.5% |
| Surface (Hard) | ||
| Hard Win % | 0% | 0% |
Last five matches per player
Matchup overview
Agnieszka Radwanska and Anna Lena Friedsam face off in the Semifinals at Shenzhen on Hard.
Agnieszka Radwanska leads 2-0 over 2 previous meetings.
Agnieszka Radwanska is 1-4 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: W vs Bethanie Mattek Sands (Sep 17).
Anna Lena Friedsam is 3-2 over the last 5 matches. Latest result: L vs Clervie Ngounoue (Jun 23).
Share this match
