Vit Kopriva vs Zizou BergsPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Vit Kopriva and Zizou Bergs have met 2 times since 2021; they are level 1–1. Their first meeting came at St. Petersburg 1 Challenger in 2021 on hard. Across all meetings Kopriva has taken 2 sets to Bergs's 3. Their most recent meeting: Vit Kopriva won at Braunschweig Challenger (2021).
Upcoming match
- Tournament
- Shanghai Rolex Masters - Shanghai
- Level
- ATP Masters 1000
- Round
- 1st Round
- Surface
- Hard
- Date & time
- October 8 · 6:45 AM ET
Book odds
Set spread
Game spread
Record at prices like this
At 3.38 or longer, Vit Kopriva has won 10 of 37 (27%). The price implied 22%, so Vit Kopriva has beaten it by 5 points.
At 1.33 or shorter, Zizou Bergs has won 50 of 57 (88%). The price implied 78%, so Zizou Bergs has beaten it by 10 points.
Book prices with the bookmaker margin removed, across every priced match we hold for each player. Green beats the price by 3 points or more, red falls that far short, grey is within 3 points. Samples under ten are not shown.
Zizou Bergs meets Vit Kopriva in the 1st Round of the Shanghai Rolex Masters on October 8, on hard court. The Belgian ranks 39th; the Czech sits at 68th. Both arrive in Shanghai having dropped their last two matches, though recent activity differs: Kopriva played twice in the past fortnight while Bergs contested just one match seven days ago.
The head-to-head stands level at 1-1. Bergs has won 2 of his last 5 matches; Kopriva has won 1 of 5. On hard court, Bergs owns a 40% win rate in recent play while Kopriva sits at 45%. Recent common opponents offer mixed signals: Bergs defeated Felix Auger-Aliassime and Ugo Humbert while losing to Zhizhen Zhang, whereas Kopriva beat Zhang and Hamad Medjedovic but fell to Humbert and Auger-Aliassime.
Bergs relies on his serve as his primary weapon; Kopriva builds points from the baseline. Bergs has struggled for consistency on hard court despite the surface suiting his game, posting a 40% win rate. Kopriva's baseline approach performs marginally better on the surface at 45%, but both players arrive in poor form. The match will be decided by whether Bergs converts his service opportunities or Kopriva establishes rhythm in longer exchanges.
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Kopriva | Bergs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Vit Kopriva | Zizou Bergs | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 81% | 21/26 | 59% | 13/22 |
| Wins a set when losing | 43% | 13/30 | 33% | 8/24 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 32% | 18/56 | 37% | 17/46 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 53% | 10/19 | 33% | 8/24 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 66% | 23/35 | 50% | 11/22 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 38% | 6/16 | 33% | 7/21 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 77% | 24/31 | 84% | 16/19 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 68% | 21/31 | 68% | 13/19 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 2 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Kopriva 0, Bergs 1).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Kopriva
🎯 Baseliner
Bergs
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 53% vs 🎯 Baseliner across 1,724 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Zizou Bergs.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the baseliner's precise groundstrokes.
Previous meetings
2 career meetings, newest first
Jul 8, 2021
Braunschweig Challenger
C Clay · Quarterfinals
Mar 6, 2021
St. Petersburg 1 Challenger
H Hard · Semifinals
Prop Research
Hit rates on common betting markets · Last 90 days
| Outcome | Kopriva | Bergs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Vit Kopriva | Zizou Bergs | ||
| 1 or more | 91% | 10/11 | 100% | 10/10 |
| 3 or more | 36% | 4/11 | 80% | 8/10 |
| 5 or more | 27% | 3/11 | 80% | 8/10 |
| 10 or more | 18% | 2/11 | 30% | 3/10 |
| 15 or more | 0% | 0/11 | 0% | 0/10 |
| 20 or more | 0% | 0/11 | 0% | 0/10 |
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Kopriva | Bergs |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 3–8 | 5–7 |
| Avg odds | 2.63 | 2.09 |
| ROI % | -57.5% | -44.1% |
| Units P/L | -6.32u | -5.29u |
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Kopriva | Bergs |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 1 | 2 |
| Events | 3 | 2 |
| Matches | 3 | 1 |
| Distance | 1,611 mi · 2,592 km | 1,092 mi · 1,758 km |
| Route | CHN | JPN → CHN |
Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Bergs has a higher win rate against shared opponents (60% vs Kopriva's 30%).
| Opponent | Kopriva | Bergs |
|---|---|---|
| Jiri Lehecka | L 46 26 | L 36 76 36 |
| Tomas Martin Etcheverry | L 36 46 06 | L 67 67 |
| Taylor Fritz | L 16 46 67 | L 36 46 |
| Jaime Faria | W 63 62 | W 76 46 62 63 |
| Jan Choinski | L 36 57 26 | W 63 63 |
| Ugo Humbert | L 36 26 | W 62 75 46 36 63 |
| Alexander Zverev | L 36 64 26 | L 26 57 |
| Felix Auger-Aliassime | L 57 16 | W 64 62 |
| Arthur Rinderknech | W | W 63 76 |
| Andrey Rublev | W 63 64 | W 64 61 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Alex Molcan
China Open - Beijing · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 28
Denis Shapovalov
Chengdu Open - Chengdu · 2nd Round
Sep 25
Jia Hu
Chengdu Open - Chengdu · 1st Round
Sep 23
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
U.S. Open - New York · 1st Round
Aug 31
Lloyd Harris
Cancun Challenger · Quarterfinals
Aug 22
Gauthier Onclin
Cancun Challenger · 2nd Round
Aug 20
Quentin Halys
Cincinnati Open - Cincinnati · 1st Round
Aug 14
Jiri Lehecka
National Bank Open - Montreal · 2nd Round
Aug 5
Jiri Lehecka
Japan Open Tennis Championships - Tokyo · 1st Round
Oct 1
Jurij Rodionov
Davis Cup, World Group, Q2, AUT-BEL · Rubber 4
Sep 19
Lukas Neumayer
Davis Cup, World Group, Q2, AUT-BEL · Rubber 2
Sep 18
Botic van de Zandschulp
U.S. Open - New York · 3rd Round
Sep 6
Jesper de Jong
U.S. Open - New York · 2nd Round
Sep 4
Carlos Taberner
U.S. Open - New York · 1st Round
Sep 3
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Quebec City Challenger · Quarterfinals
Aug 21
Andrea Pellegrino
Quebec City Challenger · 2nd Round
Aug 21
Rivalry momentum
Cumulative head-to-head lead over time
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 54–62 matches
| Metric | Kopriva | Bergs |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 45% | 48% |
| Sets won | 47% | 48% |
| Games won | 49% | 50% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Kopriva | Bergs |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Challenger Tour | 1 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Kopriva | Bergs |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 0 | 1 |
| Clay | 1 | 0 |