Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Tim Handel vs Tomas FarjatPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Tim Handel and Tomas Farjat have met 1 time since 2026; Tim Handel leads 1–0. Across all meetings Handel has taken 2 sets to Farjat's 0. Their most recent meeting: Tim Handel won at M25 Wetzlar (2026).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months

IndicatorHandelFarjat
Wins in straight sets82%80%
Wins a set when losing37%50%
Goes to a deciding set29%32%
Covers −1.5 sets as favorite59%50%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog54%50%
Tiebreak sets won37%53%
Wins after taking set 167%95%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 167%84%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Handel 1, Farjat 0).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Handel

🛡️ The Spoiler

Strong court coverageStrong retrievalDefensive consistencyBeats elite opponents
vs

Farjat

💥 Big Hitter

Power groundstrokesHigh winner countAggressive shotsShort rallies

Matchup analysis

The 💥 Big Hitter archetype wins about 58% vs 🛡️ The Spoiler across 311 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Tomas Farjat.

Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the the spoiler's strong court coverage.

Previous meetings

1 career meeting, newest first

Jul 28, 2026

M25 Wetzlar

C Clay · 1st Round

763
62
Handel

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days

MetricHandelFarjat
W-L7–70–2
Avg odds2.113.71
ROI %-18.0%-100.0%
Units P/L-2.52u-2.00u

Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricHandelFarjat
Countries1
Events1
Matches5
Distance
RouteGER

Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Common opponents

Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months

Across 2 shared opponents, both Handel and Farjat posted a 50% win rate.

OpponentHandelFarjat
Jamie Mackenzie
L
64
36
46
L
26
64
36
George Lazarov
W
26
76
61
W
62
62

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Handel
LWWWWLWL
L

Arthur Nagel

M25 Ueberlingen · Final

36
617

Aug 23

W

Tymur Bieldiugin

M25 Ueberlingen · Semifinals

62
64

Aug 22

W

Mika Petkovic

M25 Ueberlingen · Quarterfinals

75
75

Aug 22

W

Adrian Oetzbach

M25 Ueberlingen · 2nd Round

62
64

Aug 20

W

Maximilian Homberg

M25 Ueberlingen · 1st Round

64
768

Aug 19

L

Filip Krolo

M25 Wetzlar · 2nd Round

64
57
617

Jul 30

W

Tomas Farjat

M25 Wetzlar · 1st Round

763
62

Jul 28

L

Imanol Lopez Morillo

M25 Metzingen · 1st Round

63
16
36

Jul 22

Farjat
LLWWLWLW
L

Tim Handel

M25 Wetzlar · 1st Round

637
26

Jul 28

L

Jamie Mackenzie

M25 Metzingen · 1st Round

26
64
36

Jul 22

W

Valentin Garay

AAT Challenger IEB+ Edicion Córdoba · 2nd Round Qualifying

64
75

May 11

W

Bruno Oliveira

AAT Challenger IEB+ Edicion Córdoba · 1st Round Qualifying

64
75

May 10

L

Diego Jarry Fillol

M15 Quito · 2nd Round

46
64
36

Apr 30

W

Victor Braga

M15 Quito · 1st Round

64
64

Apr 29

L

Herman Hoeyeraal

M15 Quito · Quarterfinals

36
64
657

Apr 24

W

Diego Jarry Fillol

M15 Quito · 2nd Round

64
36
61

Apr 24

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 35–49 matches

MetricHandelFarjat
Matches won45%57%
Sets won48%59%
Games won49%52%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageHandelFarjat
ITF M2510

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceHandelFarjat
Clay10

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Tim Handel vs Tomas Farjat FAQ

Tim Handel leads the head-to-head 1–0 over 1 meetings.