Tai Sach vs Thomas FancuttPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Tai Sach and Thomas Fancutt have met 1 time since 2026; Thomas Fancutt leads 1–0. Across all meetings Sach has taken 1 sets to Fancutt's 2. Their most recent meeting: Thomas Fancutt won at M25 Launceston 1 (2026).
Upcoming match
- Tournament
- Brisbane 3 Challenger
- Level
- ATP Challenger Tour
- Round
- 3rd Round Qualifying
- Surface
- Hard
- Date & time
- November 8 · 8:55 PM ET
Book odds
Set spread
Game spread
Record at prices like this
At 2.06 or longer, Tai Sach has won 9 of 28 (32%). The price implied 37%, so Tai Sach has fallen 5 points short of it.
Book prices with the bookmaker margin removed, across every priced match we hold for each player. Green beats the price by 3 points or more, red falls that far short, grey is within 3 points. Samples under ten are not shown.
Thomas Fancutt and Tai Sach meet in the 3rd Round Qualifying at Brisbane 3 Challenger on November 8 on hard court. Fancutt sits at number 691 in the rankings, while Sach holds number 514. Both players arrive with back-to-back match action already in their legs this week.
Fancutt leads the head-to-head 3-0 over Sach. However, recent form tells a different story. Sach has won 3 of his last 5 matches and 4 of his last 10, while Fancutt has won 1 of 5 and 3 of 10. On hard courts, Fancutt's record stands at 8-12 (40%), compared to Sach's 9-11 (45%).
Fancutt relies heavily on his serve as his primary weapon. Sach plays a reactive game, building points through returns and counterattacking. On hard court, Fancutt needs his first serve to land consistently and hold serve frequently; Sach requires patience and the chance to dictate off the return and force baseline exchanges where his speed and timing can disrupt rhythm.
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Sach | Fancutt | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Tai Sach | Thomas Fancutt | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 73% | 30/41 | 52% | 13/25 |
| Wins a set when losing | 42% | 16/38 | 39% | 7/18 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 34% | 27/79 | 44% | 19/43 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 63% | 22/35 | 55% | 6/11 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 58% | 22/38 | 74% | 20/27 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 55% | 11/20 | 60% | 12/20 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 79% | 37/47 | 87% | 20/23 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 64% | 30/47 | 57% | 13/23 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 0 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Sach 0, Fancutt 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Sach
🪃 Counterpuncher
Fancutt
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 56% vs 🪃 Counterpuncher across 3,416 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Thomas Fancutt.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Mar 4, 2026
M25 Launceston 1
H Hard · 1st Round
Prop Research
Hit rates on common betting markets · Last 90 days
| Outcome | Sach | Fancutt | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Tai Sach | Thomas Fancutt | ||
| 1 or more | 100% | 15/15 | 100% | 13/13 |
| 3 or more | 47% | 7/15 | 69% | 9/13 |
| 5 or more | 27% | 4/15 | 46% | 6/13 |
| 10 or more | 13% | 2/15 | 23% | 3/13 |
| 15 or more | 0% | 0/15 | 8% | 1/13 |
| 20 or more | 0% | 0/15 | 8% | 1/13 |
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Sach | Fancutt |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 7–8 | 6–6 |
| Avg odds | 2.14 | 2.49 |
| ROI % | -28.4% | -7.3% |
| Units P/L | -4.26u | -0.87u |
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Fancutt has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Sach's 50%).
| Opponent | Sach | Fancutt |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown Player | W 64 64 | W 62 62 |
| Hiroki Moriya | L 76 06 46 | W 76 46 61 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Unknown Player
Brisbane 3 Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Nov 8
Philip Sekulic
M25 Tamworth · Quarterfinals
Oct 30
Ymerali Ibraimi
M25 Tamworth · 2nd Round
Oct 29
Naoki Nakagawa
M25 Tamworth · 1st Round
Oct 28
Derek Pham
M25 Tamworth · 1st Round
Oct 22
Casey Hoole
M25 Darwin · 2nd Round
Oct 8
Darcy Nicholls
M25 Darwin · 1st Round
Oct 7
Jeremy Beale
M25 Darwin · 1st Round
Sep 30
Evan Zhu
Brisbane 3 Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Nov 8
Woobin Shin
Seoul Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Oct 25
Luka Pavlovic
Jinan Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Oct 11
Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong
Jingshan Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 28
Marat Sharipov
Guangzhou Challenger · 1st Round
Sep 15
James Kent Trotter
Guangzhou Challenger · 3rd Round Qualifying
Sep 14
Zijiang Yang
Guangzhou Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 13
Maxime Janvier
Cassis Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 6
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 43–79 matches
| Metric | Sach | Fancutt |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 52% | 58% |
| Sets won | 53% | 54% |
| Games won | 50% | 51% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Sach | Fancutt |
|---|---|---|
| ITF M25 | 0 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Sach | Fancutt |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 0 | 1 |