Strong Kirchheimer vs Tyler ZinkPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Strong Kirchheimer and Tyler Zink have met 3 times since 2024; Tyler Zink leads 2–1. Their first meeting came at Columbus in 2024 on hard. On hard courts Zink leads 2–1. Across all meetings Kirchheimer has taken 3 sets to Zink's 5. Their most recent meeting: Tyler Zink won at Lexington Challenger (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Kirchheimer | Zink | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Strong Kirchheimer | Tyler Zink | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 56% | 15/27 | 56% | 15/27 |
| Wins a set when losing | 31% | 9/29 | 32% | 10/31 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 38% | 21/56 | 38% | 22/58 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 47% | 9/19 | 36% | 9/25 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 48% | 13/27 | 48% | 14/29 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 38% | 10/26 | 42% | 11/26 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 80% | 20/25 | 85% | 22/26 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 60% | 15/25 | 58% | 15/26 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 3 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Kirchheimer 0, Zink 1).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Kirchheimer
🎾 All-Court
Zink
🤖 Servebot
Matchup analysis
The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 54% vs 🎾 All-Court across 703 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Tyler Zink.
Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the all-court's tactical versatility.
Previous meetings
3 career meetings, newest first
Aug 2, 2026
Lexington Challenger
H Hard · 1st Round Qualifying
Nov 12, 2024
Champaign Challenger
H Hard · 1st Round
Sep 16, 2024
Columbus
H Hard · 1st Round Qualifying
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Kirchheimer | Zink |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–2 | 4–8 |
| Avg odds | 2.86 | 2.12 |
| ROI % | -100.0% | -51.2% |
| Units P/L | -2.00u | -6.14u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Kirchheimer | Zink |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | — | 1 |
| Events | — | 2 |
| Matches | — | 2 |
| Distance | — | 1,953 mi · 3,143 km |
| Route | — | USA |
Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Across 6 shared opponents, both Kirchheimer and Zink posted a 33% win rate.
| Opponent | Kirchheimer | Zink |
|---|---|---|
| Adhithya Ganesan | W 64 63 | W 76 67 76 |
| Braden Shick | L 67 61 26 | L 36 57 |
| Thomas Faurel | W 46 75 76 | W 60 63 |
| Stefan Kozlov | L 06 46 | L 46 16 |
| Daniel De Jonge | L 67 46 | L 63 26 57 |
| Daniel De Jonge | L 67 46 | L 63 26 57 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Alexander Ikenna Okonkwo
M25 East Lansing · 1st Round
Aug 12
Tyler Zink
Lexington Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Aug 2
Enzo Aguiard
Winnipeg Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Jul 19
Philip Sekulic
Granby Challenger · 1st Round
Jul 14
Edward Winter
Granby Challenger · 3rd Round Qualifying
Jul 13
Kody Pearson
Granby Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Jul 12
Jay Dylan Hara Friend
M25 Laval · Quarterfinals
Jul 10
Tristan Stringer
Futures 2026
Jul 10
Mitchell Krueger
Columbus Challenger · 1st Round
Sep 28
Federico Agustin Gomez
San Diego 2 Challenger · 1st Round
Sep 22
Abedallah Shelbayh
Tiburon Challenger · 1st Round
Sep 14
Luis Felipe Miguel
Kingston 2 Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 24
Valentin Royer
Kingston 1 Challenger · 2nd Round
Aug 19
Lucas Andrade Da Silva
Kingston 1 Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 18
Gauthier Onclin
Brownsburg Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 11
Millen Hurrion
Lexington Challenger · 3rd Round Qualifying
Aug 3
Rivalry momentum
Cumulative head-to-head lead over time
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 56–58 matches
| Metric | Kirchheimer | Zink |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 48% | 47% |
| Sets won | 47% | 46% |
| Games won | 50% | 50% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Kirchheimer | Zink |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Challenger Tour | 1 | 2 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Kirchheimer | Zink |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 1 | 2 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.