Stijn Paardekooper vs Yannik KelmPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Stijn Paardekooper and Yannik Kelm have met 1 time since 2026; Yannik Kelm leads 1–0. Across all meetings Paardekooper has taken 1 sets to Kelm's 2. Their most recent meeting: Yannik Kelm won at M25 The Hague (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Paardekooper | Kelm | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Stijn Paardekooper | Yannik Kelm | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 80% | 12/15 | 89% | 47/53 |
| Wins a set when losing | 57% | 8/14 | 56% | 15/27 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 38% | 11/29 | 26% | 21/80 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 50% | 7/14 | 73% | 30/41 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 92% | 12/13 | 84% | 26/31 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 60% | 6/10 | 64% | 9/14 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 81% | 13/16 | 86% | 48/56 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 75% | 12/16 | 84% | 47/56 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 0 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Paardekooper 0, Kelm 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Paardekooper
🛡️ The Spoiler
Kelm
⚔️ The Gladiator
Matchup analysis
The ⚔️ The Gladiator archetype wins about 54% vs 🛡️ The Spoiler across 288 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Yannik Kelm.
The Gladiator players often use physical intensity and balanced game to pressure the the spoiler's strong court coverage.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Jul 10, 2026
M25 The Hague
C Clay · Quarterfinals
Prop Research
Hit rates on common betting markets · Last 90 days
| Outcome | Paardekooper | Kelm | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Stijn Paardekooper | Yannik Kelm | ||
| 1 or more | 91% | 10/11 | 80% | 24/30 |
| 3 or more | 82% | 9/11 | 30% | 9/30 |
| 5 or more | 46% | 5/11 | 3% | 1/30 |
| 10 or more | 0% | 0/11 | 0% | 0/30 |
| 15 or more | 0% | 0/11 | 0% | 0/30 |
| 20 or more | 0% | 0/11 | 0% | 0/30 |
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Paardekooper | Kelm |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 6–5 | 30–4 |
| Avg odds | 2.26 | 1.48 |
| ROI % | +24.4% | +31.5% |
| Units P/L | +2.68u | +10.72u |
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Paardekooper | Kelm |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 2 | — |
| Events | 2 | — |
| Matches | 4 | — |
| Distance | — | — |
| Route | BEL → NED | — |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Kelm has a higher win rate against shared opponents (75% vs Paardekooper's 25%).
| Opponent | Paardekooper | Kelm |
|---|---|---|
| Louis Wessels | L 36 67 | L 46 46 |
| Mateja Stanisavljevic | W 67 62 60 | W 61 64 |
| Mika Petkovic | L 46 64 46 | W 64 62 |
| Lorenzo Angelini | L 36 36 | W 64 62 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Jelle Sels
M25 Oldenzaal · 1st Round
Aug 25
Jack Loge
M15 Lambermont · Quarterfinals
Aug 21
Noah Schlagenhauf
M15 Lambermont · 2nd Round
Aug 20
Noah Thurner
M15 Lambermont · 1st Round
Aug 19
Louis Wessels
Bunschoten challenger
Jul 12
Yannik Kelm
M25 The Hague · Quarterfinals
Jul 10
Jay Clarke
M25 The Hague · 2nd Round
Jul 9
Mateja Stanisavljevic
M25 The Hague · 1st Round
Jul 8
Tom Sickenberger
M25 Wetzlar · Quarterfinals
Jul 31
Aaron Funk
M25 Wetzlar · 2nd Round
Jul 30
Deney Wassermann
M25 Wetzlar · 1st Round
Jul 29
Patrick Zahraj
M25 Metzingen · Semifinals
Jul 25
Johan Nikles
M25 Metzingen · Quarterfinals
Jul 24
David Eichenseher
M25 Metzingen · 2nd Round
Jul 23
John Hallquist Lithen
M25 Metzingen · 1st Round
Jul 21
Louis Wessels
M25 The Hague · Semifinals
Jul 11
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 29–80 matches
| Metric | Paardekooper | Kelm |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 52% | 66% |
| Sets won | 55% | 67% |
| Games won | 52% | 56% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Paardekooper | Kelm |
|---|---|---|
| ITF M25 | 0 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Paardekooper | Kelm |
|---|---|---|
| Clay | 0 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.