Steven De Waard vs Thomas FancuttPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Steven De Waard and Thomas Fancutt have met 2 times since 2016; Steven De Waard leads 2–0. Their first meeting came at Canberra 2 in 2016 on hard. On hard courts Waard leads 2–0. Waard has won the last 2 meetings. Across all meetings Waard has taken 4 sets to Fancutt's 0. Their most recent meeting: Steven De Waard won at Canberra 2 (2017).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | De Waard | Fancutt | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Steven De Waard | Thomas Fancutt | ||
| Wins in straight sets | — | 50% | 7/14 | |
| Wins a set when losing | — | 45% | 5/11 | |
| Goes to a deciding set | — | 48% | 12/25 | |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | — | 25% | 1/4 | |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | — | 78% | 14/18 | |
| Tiebreak sets won | — | 47% | 7/15 | |
| Wins after taking set 1 | — | 77% | 10/13 | |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | — | 54% | 7/13 | |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample — read with care. Head-to-head: 2 of 2 completed meetings ended in straight sets (De Waard 2, Fancutt 0).
Previous meetings
2 career meetings, newest first
Oct 30, 2017
Canberra 2
H Hard · 1st Round Qualifying
Nov 2, 2016
Canberra 2
H Hard · Round of 32
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Waard | Fancutt |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 3–4 |
| Avg odds | - | 2.50 |
| ROI % | - | -37.6% |
| Units P/L | - | -2.63u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Waard | Fancutt |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | — | 2 |
| Events | — | 2 |
| Matches | — | 3 |
| Distance | — | — |
| Route | — | USA → JAM |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Ruben McCormack
Launceston · 1st Round Qualifying
Feb 5
Renta Tokuda
Launceston · 2nd Round Qualifying
Feb 5
Edward Bourchier
Burnie · 1st Round Qualifying
Jan 29
Chanchai Sookton-eng
Canberra · 1st Round Qualifying
Jan 8
James Frawley
Canberra · 2nd Round Qualifying
Jan 8
Harry Bourchier
Canberra · 3rd Round Qualifying
Jan 8
Hugo Grenier
Playford · 1st Round Qualifying
Jan 1
Christopher O'Connell
Canberra 2 · 2nd Round Qualifying
Oct 30
Luis Felipe Miguel
Kingston 2 Challenger · 2nd Round
Aug 26
Karl Poling
Kingston 2 Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 25
Karl Poling
M25 East Lansing · 2nd Round
Aug 13
Lincoln Battle
M25 East Lansing · 1st Round
Aug 11
Jie Cui
Lincoln Challenger · 1st Round
Jul 14
Hiroki Moriya
Lincoln challenger
Jul 13
Kaylan Bigun
Lincoln challenger
Jul 12
Mathys Erhard
Plovdiv Challenger · 1st Round
Jun 23
Rivalry momentum
Cumulative head-to-head lead over time
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 25–25 matches
| Metric | Waard | Fancutt |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | - | 56% |
| Sets won | - | 53% |
| Games won | - | 51% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Waard | Fancutt |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Challenger Tour | 2 | 0 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Waard | Fancutt |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 2 | 0 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.