Spencer Papa vs Timo LegoutPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Spencer Papa and Timo Legout have met 1 time since 2026; Timo Legout leads 1–0. Across all meetings Papa has taken 0 sets to Legout's 2. Their most recent meeting: Timo Legout won at M25 Southaven (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Papa | Legout | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Spencer Papa | Timo Legout | ||
| Wins in straight sets | — | 86% | 19/22 | |
| Wins a set when losing | 0% | 0/1 | 25% | 2/8 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 0% | 0/1 | 17% | 5/30 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | — | 69% | 11/16 | |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | — | 67% | 6/9 | |
| Tiebreak sets won | — | 25% | 1/4 | |
| Wins after taking set 1 | — | 95% | 21/22 | |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | — | 86% | 19/22 | |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample — read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Papa 0, Legout 1).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Papa
🏃 Pusher
Legout
⚔️ The Gladiator
Matchup analysis
The ⚔️ The Gladiator archetype wins about 68% vs 🏃 Pusher across 36 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Timo Legout.
The Gladiator players often use physical intensity and balanced game to pressure the pusher's extreme retrieval.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Aug 5, 2026
M25 Southaven
H Hard · 1st Round
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Papa | Legout |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | - | 15–4 |
| Avg odds | - | 1.90 |
| ROI % | - | +35.1% |
| Units P/L | - | +6.67u |
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Papa | Legout |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 1 | 1 |
| Events | 1 | 1 |
| Matches | 1 | 4 |
| Distance | — | — |
| Route | USA | USA |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Timo Legout
M25 Southaven · 1st Round
Aug 5
Aron Hiltzik
Knoxville · 1st Round Qualifying
Nov 7
Emilio Gomez
Tiburon · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 25
Kaichi Uchida
Tiburon · 2nd Round Qualifying
Sep 25
Joe Salisbury
Charlottesville · 1st Round Qualifying
Nov 2
Timo Stodder
Knoxville · 1st Round Qualifying
Nov 1
Evan Zhu
M25 Southaven · Final
Aug 9
Jack Anthrop
M25 Southaven · Quarterfinals
Aug 7
Alexander Frusina
M25 Southaven · 2nd Round
Aug 6
Spencer Papa
M25 Southaven · 1st Round
Aug 5
Alexander Frusina
M25 Louisville · Quarterfinals
Jul 17
Oliver Bonding
M25 Louisville · 2nd Round
Jul 16
Donald Nikolas Stoot
M25 Louisville · 1st Round
Jul 15
Nikolas Stoot
Futures 2026
Jul 15
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 1–31 matches
| Metric | Papa | Legout |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 0% | 71% |
| Sets won | 0% | 70% |
| Games won | 33% | 56% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Papa | Legout |
|---|---|---|
| ITF M25 | 0 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Papa | Legout |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 0 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.