Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Shahar Peer vs Tena LukasPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Shahar Peer and Tena Lukas have met 1 time since 2016; Shahar Peer leads 1โ€“0. Across all meetings Peer has taken 2 sets to Lukas's 1. Their most recent meeting: Shahar Peer won at Fed Cup G1 RR: CRO vs ISR (2016).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches ยท Last 12 months

IndicatorPeerLukas
Wins in straight setsโ€”63%
Wins a set when losingโ€”50%
Goes to a deciding setโ€”43%
Covers โˆ’1.5 sets as favoriteโ€”45%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdogโ€”58%
Tiebreak sets wonโ€”43%
Wins after taking set 1โ€”79%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 1โ€”58%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample โ€” read with care. Head-to-head: 0 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Peer 0, Lukas 0).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Peer

โš™๏ธ Grinder

Relentless consistencyDeep court positioningHigh rally toleranceMental fortitude
vs

Lukas

๐Ÿ’ฅ Big Hitter

Power groundstrokesHigh winner countAggressive shotsShort rallies

Matchup analysis

The ๐Ÿ’ฅ Big Hitter archetype wins about 60% vs โš™๏ธ Grinder across 1,327 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Tena Lukas.

Big Hitter players often use power groundstrokes and high winner count to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency.

Previous meetings

1 career meeting, newest first

Feb 5, 2016

Fed Cup G1 RR: CRO vs ISR

H Hard ยท Round Robin

36
61
62
Peer

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches ยท Last 90 days

MetricPeerLukas
W-L-7โ€“8
Avg odds-1.84
ROI %--38.5%
Units P/L--5.77u

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricPeerLukas
Countriesโ€”2
Eventsโ€”2
Matchesโ€”5
Distanceโ€”โ€”
Routeโ€”POR โ†’ ESP

Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Peer
LWWLLWLL
L

Kateryna Bondarenko

Fed Cup G1 PPO: UKR vs ISR ยท Round Robin

16
16

Feb 6

W

Tena Lukas

Fed Cup G1 RR: CRO vs ISR ยท Round Robin

36
61
62

Feb 5

W

Valeria Gorlats

Fed Cup G1 RR: EST vs ISR ยท Round Robin

60
63

Feb 4

L

Ipek Soylu

Fed Cup G1 RR: TUR vs ISR ยท Round Robin

75
36
26

Feb 3

L

Sara Errani

Bucharest ยท Round of 16

6577
26

Jul 16

W

Kateryna Bondarenko

Bucharest ยท Round of 32

26
64
64

Jul 15

L

Kaia Kanepi

Katowice ยท Round of 32

16
26

Apr 8

L

Lin Zhu

Pattaya ยท Round of 32

6577
16

Feb 11

Lukas
LWWLWLWW
L

Nastasja Schunk

W50 Oldenzaal ยท Quarterfinals

16
26

Aug 28

W

Joy De Zeeuw

W50 Oldenzaal ยท 2nd Round

62
64

Aug 27

W

Arina Gabriela Vasilescu

W50 Oldenzaal ยท 1st Round

36
64
61

Aug 26

L

Lola Giza

W35 Erwitte ยท 2nd Round

26
46

Aug 20

W

Leticia Solakov

W35 Erwitte ยท 1st Round

64
64

Aug 19

L

Eva Bennemann

W75 Hechingen ยท Quarterfinals

62
657
657

Jul 31

W

Anastasia Tikhonova

W75 Hechingen ยท 2nd Round

63
26
75

Jul 30

W

Dalila Jakupovic

W75 Hechingen ยท 1st Round

63
62

Jul 29

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won ยท Last 12 months ยท 55โ€“55 matches

MetricPeerLukas
Matches won-55%
Sets won-55%
Games won-52%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StagePeerLukas
BJK Cup10

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfacePeerLukas
Hard10

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Shahar Peer vs Tena Lukas FAQ

Shahar Peer leads the head-to-head 1โ€“0 over 1 meetings.