Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Ruben Bemelmans vs Zizou BergsPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Ruben Bemelmans and Zizou Bergs have met 2 times since 2022; Zizou Bergs leads 2โ€“0. Their first meeting came at Cherbourg in 2022 on hard. Bergs has won the last 2 meetings. Across all meetings Bemelmans has taken 0 sets to Bergs's 4. Their most recent meeting: Zizou Bergs won at Ilkley (2022).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches ยท Last 12 months

IndicatorBemelmansBergs
Wins in straight setsโ€”62%
Wins a set when losingโ€”32%
Goes to a deciding setโ€”35%
Covers โˆ’1.5 sets as favoriteโ€”35%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdogโ€”54%
Tiebreak sets wonโ€”46%
Wins after taking set 1โ€”86%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 1โ€”73%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample โ€” read with care. Head-to-head: 2 of 2 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Bemelmans 0, Bergs 2).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Bemelmans

๐ŸŽฏ Baseliner

Precise groundstrokesCourt controlPatient constructionConsistent depth
vs

Bergs

๐Ÿค– Servebot

High ace rateDominant serviceWeaker returnBig first serve

Matchup analysis

๐ŸŽฏ Baseliner vs ๐Ÿค– Servebot is historically tight (48% vs 52%, 1,749 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and the head-to-head matter most.

Previous meetings

2 career meetings, newest first

Jun 12, 2022

Ilkley

G Grass ยท 1st Round Qualifying

6577
46
Bergs

Feb 11, 2022

Cherbourg

H Hard ยท Quarterfinals

36
36
Bergs

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches ยท Last 90 days

MetricBemelmansBergs
W-L-8โ€“7
Avg odds-2.20
ROI %--1.9%
Units P/L--0.29u

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricBemelmansBergs
Countriesโ€”2
Eventsโ€”3
Matchesโ€”5
Distanceโ€”1,568 mi ยท 2,523 km
Routeโ€”CAN โ†’ USA โ†’ CAN

Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Bemelmans
LLLLLWLL
L

Geoffrey Blancaneaux

Antwerp ยท 1st Round Qualifying

64
36
36

Oct 16

L

Zizou Bergs

Ilkley ยท 1st Round Qualifying

6577
46

Jun 12

L

Zhizhen Zhang

Tunis ยท Round of 32

36
16

May 16

L

Rudolf Molleker

Heilbronn ยท 1st Round Qualifying

46
63
6477

May 8

L

Gijs Brouwer

Lugano ยท 2nd Round Qualifying

63
36
36

Mar 28

W

Giovanni Fonio

Lugano ยท 1st Round Qualifying

75
64

Mar 27

L

Marek Gengel

Biel ยท Round of 32

6477
6377

Mar 22

L

Thomas Fabbiano

Turin ยท Round of 32

75
36
6577

Feb 28

Bergs
WLLLWLLW
W

Andrea Pellegrino

Quebec City Challenger ยท 2nd Round

63
62

Aug 21

L

Stefanos Sakellaridis

Quebec City Challenger ยท Quarterfinals

637
64
46

Aug 21

L

Daniel Merida Aguilar

Cincinnati Open - Cincinnati ยท 2nd Round

36
26

Aug 16

L

Ben Shelton

National Bank Open - Montreal ยท 3rd Round

36
26

Aug 7

W

Sebastian Baez

National Bank Open - Montreal ยท 2nd Round

36
63
62

Aug 5

L

Taylor Fritz

Citi Open - Washington ยท 1st Round

36
46

Jul 27

L

Arthur Fery

Wimbledon - London ยท 3rd Round

62
57
62
637
657

Jul 4

W

Jaime Faria

Wimbledon - London ยท 2nd Round

766
46
62
63

Jul 2

Rivalry momentum

Cumulative head-to-head lead over time

โ†‘ BemelmansBergs aheadโ†“ Bergs

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won ยท Last 12 months ยท 56โ€“56 matches

MetricBemelmansBergs
Matches won-50%
Sets won-49%
Games won-50%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageBemelmansBergs
ATP Challenger Tour02

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceBemelmansBergs
Hard01
Grass01

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Ruben Bemelmans vs Zizou Bergs FAQ

Zizou Bergs leads the head-to-head 2โ€“0 over 2 meetings.