Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Ramkumar Ramanathan vs Sumit NagalPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Ramkumar Ramanathan and Sumit Nagal have met 4 times since 2018; Ramkumar Ramanathan leads 3–1. Their first meeting came at Marbella in 2018 on clay. On clay courts they are level 1–1. On hard courts Ramanathan leads 2–0. Across all meetings Ramanathan has taken 6 sets to Nagal's 3. Their most recent meeting: Sumit Nagal won at Skopje (2023).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months

IndicatorRamanathanNagal
Wins in straight sets100%68%
Wins a set when losing0%46%
Goes to a deciding set0%40%
Covers −1.5 sets as favorite—24%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog14%60%
Tiebreak sets won0%36%
Wins after taking set 1100%70%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 1100%56%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample — read with care. Head-to-head: 3 of 4 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Ramanathan 2, Nagal 1).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Ramanathan

🤖 Servebot

High ace rateDominant serviceWeaker returnBig first serve
vs

Nagal

🪃 Counterpuncher

Elite BP conversionStrong return gameDefensive consistencyRally tolerance

Matchup analysis

The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 55% vs 🪃 Counterpuncher across 3,438 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Ramkumar Ramanathan.

Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion.

Previous meetings

4 career meetings, newest first

May 21, 2023

Skopje

C Clay · 1st Round Qualifying

36
36
Nagal

Nov 12, 2019

Pune

H Hard · Quarterfinals

64
7765
Ramanathan

Oct 31, 2018

Shenzhen 2

H Hard · Round of 32

36
64
7762
Ramanathan

Mar 17, 2018

Marbella

C Clay · Round of 16

62
63
Ramanathan

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days

MetricRamanathanNagal
W-L-4–8
Avg odds-2.31
ROI %--40.3%
Units P/L--4.84u

Common opponents

Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months

Across 1 shared opponent, both Ramanathan and Nagal posted a 0% win rate.

OpponentRamanathanNagal
Hyeon Chung
L
26
26
L
62
46
57

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Ramanathan
WLLLWLLL
W

Sebastian Fanselow

Bundesliga - men

64
63

Jul 12

L

Maximilian Neuchrist

Iasi Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying

46
16

Jul 5

L

Peter Makk

Brasov Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying

36
667

Jun 28

L

Hyeon Chung

Delhi Open 2026 · 2nd Round Qualifying

26
26

Feb 16

W

Tsung-Hao Huang

Delhi Open 2026 · 1st Round Qualifying

61
63

Feb 15

L

Arthur Reymond

Bengaluru Open · 1st Round Qualifying

57
6377

Jan 4

L

Michael Vrbensky

Yokohama · 1st Round Qualifying

57
46

Nov 16

L

Yusuke Takahashi

Seoul · 1st Round Qualifying

16
6577

Oct 26

Nagal
LLLLLWLL
L

Luka Mikrut

Braga Challenger · 1st Round

26
46

Oct 7

L

Soon Woo Kwon

Davis Cup, World Group, Q2, KOR-IND · Rubber 4

16
26

Sep 19

L

Hyeon Chung

Davis Cup, World Group, Q2, KOR-IND · Rubber 2

62
46
57

Sep 18

L

Arthur Gea

U.S. Open - New York · 1st Round Qualifying

36
647

Aug 25

L

Jan Kumstat

Prague Challenger · 2nd Round

57
36

Aug 19

W

Eduardo Ribeiro

Prague Challenger · 1st Round

765
64

Aug 17

L

Max Houkes

Hamburg Challenger · 1st Round

57
26

Aug 11

L

Jan Kumstat

Liberec Challenger · Semifinals

57
46

Aug 1

Rivalry momentum

Cumulative head-to-head lead over time

↑ RamanathanRamanathan ahead↓ Nagal

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 8–50 matches

MetricRamanathanNagal
Matches won25%44%
Sets won25%48%
Games won44%49%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageRamanathanNagal
ATP Challenger Tour31

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceRamanathanNagal
Hard20
Clay11

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Ramkumar Ramanathan vs Sumit Nagal FAQ

Ramkumar Ramanathan leads the head-to-head 3–1 over 4 meetings.