Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Philip Henning vs Radu Mihai PapoePrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Upcoming match

Tournament
Hersonissos 3 Challenger
Level
ATP Challenger Tour
Round
1st Round
Surface
Hard
Date & time
November 9 Β· 4:00 AM ET

Book odds

Radu Mihai Papoe2.25
Philip Henning1.57

Set spread

Mihai Papoe -1.53.72
Henning +1.51.22

Game spread

Mihai Papoe +2.51.84
Henning -2.51.83
Mihai PapoeClay-court specialist (85%)HenningHard-court specialist (77%)

Record at prices like this

Philip Henning1.57implies 66%won 76%+10 pts

At 1.57 or shorter, Philip Henning has won 22 of 29 (76%). The price implied 66%, so Philip Henning has beaten it by 10 points.

Book prices with the bookmaker margin removed, across every priced match we hold for each player. Green beats the price by 3 points or more, red falls that far short, grey is within 3 points. Samples under ten are not shown.

Philip Henning meets Radu Mihai Papoe in the first round of the Hersonissos 3 Challenger on November 9, 2026. Henning ranks 236th; Papoe sits at 280th. The hard court draw pairs two players separated by recent trajectory, with Henning coming off five matches in two weeks and Papoe returning after nearly three weeks away from competition.

The two have never faced each other. Henning has won 2 of his last 5 matches but holds a 6-4 record over his past 10. Papoe Radu Mihai has steadier recent numbers, posting a 6-4 record in his last 10 and 3-2 over his most recent five, though he arrives without match play since mid-October.

On hard courts, Henning has compiled a 13-7 record, showing comfort with the surface and its pace. Papoe Radu Mihai owns a 12-8 hard court record, slightly lower but still solid. Henning's game relies on versatility across all strokes and court positions, while Papoe brings a grittier, more reactive approach. The match will test whether Henning's recent activity and completeness outweigh Papoe's steadiness and time to prepare.

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months

IndicatorHenningMihai Papoe
Wins in straight sets82%87%
Wins a set when losing46%38%
Goes to a deciding set27%18%
Covers βˆ’1.5 sets as favorite61%47%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog53%86%
Tiebreak sets won45%50%
Wins after taking set 189%97%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 175%90%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record.

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Henning

πŸ‘‘ The Complete Package

Elite serve & returnHigh BP conversionAll-surface dominanceClutch performer
vs

Papoe

βš”οΈ The Gladiator

Physical intensityBalanced gameStrong in deciding setsCompetitive fighter

Matchup analysis

The πŸ‘‘ The Complete Package archetype wins about 53% vs βš”οΈ The Gladiator across 723 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Philip Henning.

The Complete Package players often use elite serve & return and high bp conversion to pressure the the gladiator's physical intensity.

Previous meetings

First career meeting

Henning and Papoe have never faced each other on tour.

Prop Research

Hit rates on common betting markets Β· Last 90 days

OutcomeHenningPapoe
1 or more93%58%
3 or more63%8%
5 or more33%0%
10 or more0%0%
15 or more0%0%
20 or more0%0%

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days

MetricHenningPapoe
W-L18–85–4
Avg odds1.511.63
ROI %-9.2%-4.2%
Units P/L-2.39u-0.37u

Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.

Common opponents

Results vs. opponents both players faced Β· Last 12 months

Henning has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Papoe's 50%).

OpponentHenningPapoe
Thijs Boogaard
W
62
67
63
L
63
36
16
Yannick Theodor Alexandrescou
W
63
63
W
63
63

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Henning
LWLWLWWW
L

Carlo Alberto Caniato

Taranto Challenger Β· 2nd Round

64
16
647

Nov 5

W

Calvin Hemery

Taranto Challenger Β· 1st Round

61
62

Nov 3

L

Dmitry Popko

M25 Malta Β· 2nd Round

637
26

Oct 29

W

Xavi Matas Ortega

M25 Malta Β· 1st Round

63
657
63

Oct 28

L

Arthur Nagel

M25 Sarreguemines Β· Final

64
36
36

Oct 25

W

Adrien Gobat

M25 Sarreguemines Β· Semifinals

766
761

Oct 24

W

Louis Wessels

M25 Sarreguemines Β· Quarterfinals

61
75

Oct 24

W

Antoine Walch

M25 Sarreguemines Β· 2nd Round

63
75

Oct 22

Papoe
LLWWWWLW
L

Oriol Roca Batalla

Florence Challenger Β· 1st Round

46
16

Oct 20

L

Gianluca Cadenasso

San Gregorio di Catania Challenger Β· Final

46
63
46

Oct 18

W

Felix Gill

San Gregorio di Catania Challenger Β· Semifinals

64
75

Oct 17

W

Zdenek Kolar

San Gregorio di Catania Challenger Β· Quarterfinals

64
62

Oct 16

W

Luca Potenza

San Gregorio di Catania Challenger Β· 2nd Round

63
64

Oct 14

W

Michele Ribecai

San Gregorio di Catania Challenger Β· 1st Round

63
64

Oct 13

L

Borys Zgola

M25 Slobozia Β· Quarterfinals

36
57

Oct 2

W

Vladislav Melnic

M25 Slobozia Β· 2nd Round

63
62

Oct 1

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 76–94 matches

MetricHenningPapoe
Matches won70%79%
Sets won68%76%
Games won58%62%