Olivia Lincer vs Tatum EvansPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Olivia Lincer and Tatum Evans have met 1 time since 2026; Tatum Evans leads 1–0. Across all meetings Lincer has taken 1 sets to Evans's 2. Their most recent meeting: Tatum Evans won at W100 Cary (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Lincer | Evans | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Olivia Lincer | Tatum Evans | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 100% | 8/8 | 72% | 13/18 |
| Wins a set when losing | 33% | 5/15 | 57% | 4/7 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 22% | 5/23 | 36% | 9/25 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 56% | 5/9 | 71% | 10/14 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 43% | 6/14 | 63% | 5/8 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 100% | 1/1 | 50% | 3/6 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 89% | 8/9 | 89% | 17/19 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 89% | 8/9 | 68% | 13/19 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 0 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Lincer 0, Evans 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Lincer
🪃 Counterpuncher
Evans
⚔️ The Gladiator
Matchup analysis
🪃 Counterpuncher vs ⚔️ The Gladiator is historically tight (51% vs 49%, 7,862 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and the head-to-head matter most.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Jun 30, 2026
W100 Cary
H Hard · 3rd Round Qualifying
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Lincer | Evans |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 3–4 | 0–2 |
| Avg odds | 2.17 | 1.30 |
| ROI % | -13.9% | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | -0.98u | -2.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Lincer | Evans |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 2 | 1 |
| Events | 2 | 1 |
| Matches | 4 | 1 |
| Distance | — | — |
| Route | USA → TUR | UKR |
Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Amelie Van Impe
W100 Templeton · 3rd Round Qualifying
Sep 29
Sofia Elena Cabezas Dominguez
W100 Templeton · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 28
Maria Sholokhova
W50 Berkeley · 3rd Round Qualifying
Sep 22
Ela Plosnik
W50 Berkeley · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 21
Clervie Ngounoue
W100 Landisville · 1st Round Qualifying
Aug 3
Anastasia Kulikova
W75 Lexington · 2nd Round
Jul 30
Hina Inoue
W75 Lexington · 1st Round
Jul 29
Avery Alexander
W75 Granby · 3rd Round Qualifying
Jul 13
Helena Buchwald
W50 Lexington · 1st Round Qualifying
Oct 5
Kate Fakih
W35 Santa Fe · 2nd Round
Jul 23
Carmen Andreea Herea
W35 Santa Fe · 1st Round
Jul 21
Thara Gowda
W50 Columbus · 3rd Round Qualifying
Jul 7
Briley Rhoden
W50 Columbus · 1st Round Qualifying
Jul 6
Briley Rhoden
Columbus ITF
Jul 6
Ena Koike
W100 Cary · Quarterfinals
Jul 3
Madison Brengle
W100 Cary · 2nd Round
Jul 2
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 23–25 matches
| Metric | Lincer | Evans |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 35% | 72% |
| Sets won | 41% | 68% |
| Games won | 48% | 58% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Lincer | Evans |
|---|---|---|
| ITF W100 | 0 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Lincer | Evans |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 0 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.