Oliver Bonding vs Timo LegoutPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
๐ฌ๐งOliver Bonding
#950 ยท 19 yrs ยท R
1 meeting ยท sets 0โ2
๐ซ๐ทTimo Legout
#441 ยท 24 yrs ยท R
3wTitleOliver Bonding and Timo Legout have met 1 time since 2026; Timo Legout leads 1โ0. Across all meetings Bonding has taken 0 sets to Legout's 2. Their most recent meeting: Timo Legout won at M25 Louisville (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches ยท Last 12 months
| Indicator | Bonding | Legout | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Oliver Bonding | Timo Legout | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 87% | 13/15 | 86% | 19/22 |
| Wins a set when losing | 31% | 4/13 | 25% | 2/8 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 21% | 6/28 | 17% | 5/30 |
| Covers โ1.5 sets as favorite | 62% | 8/13 | 69% | 11/16 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 67% | 8/12 | 67% | 6/9 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 25% | 2/8 | 25% | 1/4 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 82% | 14/17 | 95% | 21/22 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 76% | 13/17 | 86% | 19/22 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Bonding 0, Legout 1).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Bonding
๐พ All-Court
Legout
โ๏ธ The Gladiator
Matchup analysis
The ๐พ All-Court archetype wins about 55% vs โ๏ธ The Gladiator across 321 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Oliver Bonding.
All-Court players often use tactical versatility and net approach ability to pressure the the gladiator's physical intensity.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Jul 16, 2026
M25 Louisville
H Hard ยท 2nd Round
Prop Research
Hit rates on common betting markets ยท Last 90 days
| Outcome | Bonding | Legout | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Outcome | Oliver Bonding | Timo Legout | ||
| 1 or more | 100% | 14/14 | 85% | 17/20 |
| 3 or more | 79% | 11/14 | 25% | 5/20 |
| 5 or more | 36% | 5/14 | 10% | 2/20 |
| 10 or more | 0% | 0/14 | 0% | 0/20 |
| 15 or more | 0% | 0/14 | 0% | 0/20 |
| 20 or more | 0% | 0/14 | 0% | 0/20 |
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches ยท Last 90 days
| Metric | Bonding | Legout |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 9โ6 | 15โ4 |
| Avg odds | 2.05 | 1.90 |
| ROI % | -2.0% | +35.1% |
| Units P/L | -0.30u | +6.67u |
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Bonding | Legout |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 1 | 1 |
| Events | 1 | 1 |
| Matches | 2 | 4 |
| Distance | 0 mi ยท 0 km | โ |
| Route | GBR | USA |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced ยท Last 12 months
Legout has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Bonding's 50%).
| Opponent | Bonding | Legout |
|---|---|---|
| Ozan Baris | L 75 67 57 | W 64 61 |
| Justin Roberts | W 64 62 | W 64 36 64 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Oliver Tarvet
Roehampton 2 Challenger ยท 2nd Round
Aug 26
Viktor Durasovic
Roehampton 2 Challenger ยท 1st Round
Aug 25
Ozan Baris
M25 Edwardsville ยท 2nd Round
Jul 30
Jack Satterfield
M25 Edwardsville ยท 1st Round
Jul 29
Evan Bynoe
M25 Champaign ยท 1st Round
Jul 21
Timo Legout
M25 Louisville ยท 2nd Round
Jul 16
Youssef Kadiri Hassani
M25 Louisville ยท 1st Round
Jul 14
Arda Azkara
Nottingham 3 Challenger ยท 1st Round
Jul 7
Evan Zhu
M25 Southaven ยท Final
Aug 9
Jack Anthrop
M25 Southaven ยท Quarterfinals
Aug 7
Alexander Frusina
M25 Southaven ยท 2nd Round
Aug 6
Spencer Papa
M25 Southaven ยท 1st Round
Aug 5
Alexander Frusina
M25 Louisville ยท Quarterfinals
Jul 17
Oliver Bonding
M25 Louisville ยท 2nd Round
Jul 16
Donald Nikolas Stoot
M25 Louisville ยท 1st Round
Jul 15
Nikolas Stoot
Futures 2026
Jul 15
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won ยท Last 12 months ยท 28โ31 matches
| Metric | Bonding | Legout |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 54% | 71% |
| Sets won | 55% | 70% |
| Games won | 53% | 56% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Bonding | Legout |
|---|---|---|
| ITF M25 | 0 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Bonding | Legout |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 0 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.