Norbert Gombos vs Sergiy StakhovskyPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Norbert Gombos and Sergiy Stakhovsky have met 5 times since 2016; Norbert Gombos leads 3–2. Their first meeting came at Bratislava in 2016 on hard. On hard courts Gombos leads 3–2. Across all meetings Gombos has taken 8 sets to Stakhovsky's 5. Their most recent meeting: Sergiy Stakhovsky won at Pau (2021).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Gombos | Stakhovsky | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Norbert Gombos | Sergiy Stakhovsky | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 57% | 16/28 | — | |
| Wins a set when losing | 28% | 7/25 | — | |
| Goes to a deciding set | 36% | 19/53 | — | |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 50% | 12/24 | — | |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 55% | 16/29 | — | |
| Tiebreak sets won | 55% | 11/20 | — | |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 86% | 24/28 | — | |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 57% | 16/28 | — | |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample — read with care. Head-to-head: 2 of 5 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Gombos 2, Stakhovsky 0).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Gombos
⚙️ Grinder
Stakhovsky
🏃 Pusher
Matchup analysis
The ⚙️ Grinder archetype wins about 71% vs 🏃 Pusher across 41 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Norbert Gombos.
Grinder players often use relentless consistency and deep court positioning to pressure the pusher's extreme retrieval.
Previous meetings
5 career meetings, newest first
Nov 15, 2021
Pau
H Hard · Quarterfinals
Feb 27, 2019
Pau
H Hard · Round of 32
Nov 8, 2018
Bratislava
H Hard · Round of 16
Feb 2, 2018
Marseille
H Hard · 2nd Round Qualifying
Nov 12, 2016
Bratislava
H Hard · Semifinals
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Gombos | Stakhovsky |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 13–10 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.26 | - |
| ROI % | +1.4% | - |
| Units P/L | +0.33u | - |
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Gombos | Stakhovsky |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 1 | — |
| Events | 2 | — |
| Matches | 6 | — |
| Distance | 55 mi · 88 km | — |
| Route | CZE | — |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Chun-Hsin Tseng
Prague Challenger · Semifinals
Aug 21
Radu Mihai Papoe
Prague Challenger · Quarterfinals
Aug 20
Sean Cuenin
Prague Challenger · 2nd Round
Aug 19
Gilles Arnaud Bailly
Prague Challenger · 1st Round
Aug 18
Gonzalo Bueno
Liberec Challenger · Semifinals
Aug 1
Kilian Feldbausch
Liberec Challenger · Quarterfinals
Jul 31
Franco Roncadelli
Liberec Challenger · 2nd Round
Jul 30
Matyas Cerny
Liberec Challenger · 1st Round
Jul 28
J.J. Wolf
Australian Open · 1st Round Qualifying
Jan 1
Radu Albot
Pau · Semifinals
Nov 18
Dan Added
Pau · Round of 16
Nov 18
Dennis Novak
Pau · Round of 32
Nov 16
Norbert Gombos
Pau · Quarterfinals
Nov 15
Jiri Lehecka
Bratislava-2 · Round of 32
Nov 9
Fabian Marozsan
Bergamo · Round of 16
Nov 3
Matteo Arnaldi
Bergamo · Round of 32
Nov 1
Rivalry momentum
Cumulative head-to-head lead over time
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 53–53 matches
| Metric | Gombos | Stakhovsky |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 53% | - |
| Sets won | 50% | - |
| Games won | 50% | - |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Gombos | Stakhovsky |
|---|---|---|
| ATP 250 | 1 | 0 |
| ATP Challenger Tour | 2 | 2 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Gombos | Stakhovsky |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 3 | 2 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.