Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Noah Zamora vs Strong KirchheimerPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Noah Zamora and Strong Kirchheimer have met 2 times since 2025; they are level 1–1. Their first meeting came at M15 Fayetteville 1 in 2025 on hard. On hard courts they are level 1–1. Across all meetings Zamora has taken 2 sets to Kirchheimer's 3. Their most recent meeting: Strong Kirchheimer won at M15 Irvine (2026).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months

IndicatorZamoraKirchheimer
Wins in straight sets56%55%
Wins a set when losing24%28%
Goes to a deciding set37%37%
Covers βˆ’1.5 sets as favorite60%38%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog56%47%
Tiebreak sets won50%46%
Wins after taking set 193%82%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 166%61%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 2 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Zamora 0, Kirchheimer 1).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Zamora

πŸͺƒ Counterpuncher

Elite BP conversionStrong return gameDefensive consistencyRally tolerance
vs

Kirchheimer

βš™οΈ Grinder

Relentless consistencyDeep court positioningHigh rally toleranceMental fortitude

Matchup analysis

πŸͺƒ Counterpuncher vs βš™οΈ Grinder is historically tight (50% vs 50%, 1,208 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and the head-to-head matter most.

Previous meetings

2 career meetings, newest first

Jun 19, 2026

M15 Irvine

H Hard Β· Quarterfinals

36
46
Kirchheimer

Sep 17, 2025

M15 Fayetteville 1

H Hard Β· 1st Round

36
75
63
Zamora

Prop Research

Hit rates on common betting markets Β· Last 90 days

OutcomeZamoraKirchheimer
1 or more95%100%
3 or more58%38%
5 or more26%0%
10 or more0%0%
15 or more0%0%
20 or more0%0%

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days

MetricZamoraKirchheimer
W-L18–88–4
Avg odds1.962.05
ROI %+18.1%-0.3%
Units P/L+4.72u-0.03u

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricZamoraKirchheimer
Countries1β€”
Events1β€”
Matches2β€”
Distanceβ€”β€”
RouteUSAβ€”

Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Common opponents

Results vs. opponents both players faced Β· Last 12 months

Kirchheimer has a higher win rate against shared opponents (75% vs Zamora's 50%).

OpponentZamoraKirchheimer
Spencer Johnson
L
67
57
L
57
36
Roshan Santhosh
W
64
63
W
64
64
Kenta Miyoshi
L
36
26
W
61
64
Brandon Perez
W
76
61
W
63
62

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Zamora
LWLWLWWW
L

Luis Carlos Alvarez Valdes

M25 East Lansing Β· 2nd Round

26
64
06

Aug 13

W

James McCabe

M25 East Lansing Β· 1st Round

46
63
762

Aug 12

L

Bruno Kuzuhara

M25 Edwardsville Β· 2nd Round

657
46

Jul 30

W

Emon Van Loben Sels

M25 Edwardsville Β· 1st Round

62
60

Jul 29

L

Spencer Johnson

M15 Rancho Santa Fe Β· Final

627
57

Jul 12

W

Emon Van Loben Sels

M15 Rancho Santa Fe Β· Semifinals

637
63
64

Jul 11

W

Noah Johnston

M15 Rancho Santa Fe Β· Quarterfinals

75
26
64

Jul 10

W

Noah Johnston

Futures 2026

75
26
64

Jul 10

Kirchheimer
LWWLWWWW
L

Philip Sekulic

Granby Challenger Β· 1st Round

46
06

Jul 14

W

Edward Winter

Granby challenger

63
762

Jul 13

W

Kody Pearson

Granby challenger

64
61

Jul 12

L

Jay Friend

M25 Laval Β· Quarterfinals

627
63
46

Jul 11

W

Tristan Stringer

Futures 2026

36
61
764

Jul 10

W

Miko Lapalme

M25 Laval Β· 1st Round

64
64

Jul 9

W

Tristan Stringer

M25 Laval Β· 2nd Round

36
61
764

Jul 9

W

Miko Lapalme

Futures 2026

64
64

Jul 9

Rivalry momentum

Cumulative head-to-head lead over time

↑ Zamoralevel↓ Kirchheimer

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 51–63 matches

MetricZamoraKirchheimer
Matches won67%49%
Sets won60%48%
Games won53%50%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageZamoraKirchheimer
ITF M1511

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceZamoraKirchheimer
Hard11

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Noah Zamora vs Strong Kirchheimer FAQ

The head-to-head is level at 1–1 over 2 meetings.