Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Nicole Gibbs vs Tamara ZidansekPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Nicole Gibbs and Tamara Zidansek have met 1 time since 2019; Nicole Gibbs leads 1โ€“0. Across all meetings Gibbs has taken 2 sets to Zidansek's 1. Their most recent meeting: Nicole Gibbs won at Limoges (2019).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches ยท Last 12 months

IndicatorGibbsZidansek
Wins in straight setsโ€”46%
Wins a set when losingโ€”32%
Goes to a deciding setโ€”45%
Covers โˆ’1.5 sets as favoriteโ€”38%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdogโ€”63%
Tiebreak sets wonโ€”41%
Wins after taking set 1โ€”87%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 1โ€”57%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample โ€” read with care. Head-to-head: 0 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Gibbs 0, Zidansek 0).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Gibbs

โš™๏ธ Grinder

Relentless consistencyDeep court positioningHigh rally toleranceMental fortitude
vs

Zidansek

๐Ÿชƒ Counterpuncher

Elite BP conversionStrong return gameDefensive consistencyRally tolerance

Matchup analysis

The ๐Ÿชƒ Counterpuncher archetype wins about 66% vs โš™๏ธ Grinder across 3,088 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Tamara Zidansek.

Counterpuncher players often use elite bp conversion and strong return game to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency.

Previous meetings

1 career meeting, newest first

Dec 18, 2019

Limoges

H Hard ยท Round of 32

46
7765
63
Gibbs

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches ยท Last 90 days

MetricGibbsZidansek
W-L-4โ€“6
Avg odds-2.35
ROI %-+3.3%
Units P/L-+0.33u

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricGibbsZidansek
Countriesโ€”2
Eventsโ€”2
Matchesโ€”2
Distanceโ€”592 mi ยท 952 km
Routeโ€”POR โ†’ ROU

Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Gibbs
LLWLLWWL
L

Shelby Rogers

Oracle Challenger Series - Indian Wells ยท 1st Round

36
46

Mar 3

L

Coco Vandeweghe

Oracle Challenger Series - Newport Beach ยท 3rd Round

57
46

Jan 30

W

Hailey Baptiste

Oracle Challenger Series - Newport Beach ยท 2nd Round

64
64

Jan 28

L

Shelby Rogers

Shenzhen Open - Shenzhen ยท 1st Round

36
75
46

Jan 6

L

Ekaterina Alexandrova

Limoges ยท Semifinals

6678
26

Dec 21

W

Jessika Ponchet

Limoges ยท Round of 16

16
61
62

Dec 19

W

Tamara Zidansek

Limoges ยท Round of 32

46
7765
63

Dec 18

L

Angelique Kerber

Osaka ยท Round of 16

26
46

Sep 19

Zidansek
LLLLWWWL
L

Ksenia Zaytseva

China Open - Beijing ยท 1st Round Qualifying

46
677

Sep 28

L

Kimberly Birrell

Korea Open - Seoul ยท 1st Round

627
46

Sep 22

L

Tessa Johanna Brockmann

Montreux Nestle Open - Montreux ยท 1st Round

64
647
36

Sep 7

L

Maria Timofeeva

U.S. Open - New York ยท 1st Round

36
57

Aug 31

W

Bianca Andreescu

U.S. Open - New York ยท 3rd Round Qualifying

26
63
64

Aug 28

W

Guiomar Maristany Zuleta De Reales

U.S. Open - New York ยท 2nd Round Qualifying

75
63

Aug 26

W

Laura Samson

U.S. Open - New York ยท 1st Round Qualifying

657
64
75

Aug 25

L

Alevtina Ibragimova

Palermo Ladies Open - Palermo ยท 1st Round

63
46
36

Jul 21

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won ยท Last 12 months ยท 47โ€“47 matches

MetricGibbsZidansek
Matches won-60%
Sets won-54%
Games won-51%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageGibbsZidansek
WTA 25010

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceGibbsZidansek
Hard10

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Nicole Gibbs vs Tamara Zidansek FAQ

Nicole Gibbs leads the head-to-head 1โ€“0 over 1 meetings.