Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Nathan Trouve vs Strong KirchheimerPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Nathan Trouve and Strong Kirchheimer have met 1 time since 2026; Nathan Trouve leads 1–0. Across all meetings Trouve has taken 2 sets to Kirchheimer's 1. Their most recent meeting: Nathan Trouve won at M15 Los Angeles (2026).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months

IndicatorTrouveKirchheimer
Wins in straight sets75%56%
Wins a set when losing14%31%
Goes to a deciding set18%38%
Covers −1.5 sets as favorite33%47%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog25%48%
Tiebreak sets won33%38%
Wins after taking set 175%80%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 175%60%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 0 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Trouve 0, Kirchheimer 0).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Trouve

🪃 Counterpuncher

Elite BP conversionStrong return gameDefensive consistencyRally tolerance
vs

Kirchheimer

🎾 All-Court

Tactical versatilityNet approach abilitySurface adaptabilityWell-rounded game

Matchup analysis

🪃 Counterpuncher vs 🎾 All-Court is historically tight (49% vs 51%, 878 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and the head-to-head matter most.

Previous meetings

1 career meeting, newest first

Jun 10, 2026

M15 Los Angeles

H Hard · 1st Round

36
63
764
Trouve

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days

MetricTrouveKirchheimer
W-L-0–2
Avg odds-2.86
ROI %--100.0%
Units P/L--2.00u

Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.

Common opponents

Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months

Across 1 shared opponent, both Trouve and Kirchheimer posted a 0% win rate.

OpponentTrouveKirchheimer
Spencer Johnson
L
67
46
L
57
36

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Trouve
LWWWWLLW
L

Spencer Johnson

M15 Los Angeles · Quarterfinals

647
46

Jun 12

W

Marcel Latak

M15 Los Angeles · 2nd Round

61
64

Jun 11

W

Strong Kirchheimer

M15 Los Angeles · 1st Round

36
63
764

Jun 10

W

Reece Falck

M15 Los Angeles · 3rd Round Qualifying

60
64

Jun 9

W

Niels Peter Van Noord

M15 Los Angeles · 1st Round Qualifying

Jun 8

L

Marko Mesarovic

Futures 2026

36
36

May 26

L

Marko Mesarovic

M15 Lakewood · 3rd Round Qualifying

36
36

May 26

W

Diogo Morais

M15 Lakewood · 1st Round Qualifying

61
64

May 25

Kirchheimer
LLLLWWLW
L

Alexander Ikenna Okonkwo

M25 East Lansing · 1st Round

Aug 12

L

Tyler Zink

Lexington Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying

627
46

Aug 2

L

Enzo Aguiard

Winnipeg Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying

63
617
26

Jul 19

L

Philip Sekulic

Granby Challenger · 1st Round

46
06

Jul 14

W

Edward Winter

Granby Challenger · 3rd Round Qualifying

63
762

Jul 13

W

Kody Pearson

Granby Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying

64
61

Jul 12

L

Jay Dylan Hara Friend

M25 Laval · Quarterfinals

627
63
46

Jul 10

W

Tristan Stringer

Futures 2026

36
61
764

Jul 10

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 11–56 matches

MetricTrouveKirchheimer
Matches won36%48%
Sets won38%47%
Games won46%50%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageTrouveKirchheimer
ITF M1510

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceTrouveKirchheimer
Hard10

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Nathan Trouve vs Strong Kirchheimer FAQ

Nathan Trouve leads the head-to-head 1–0 over 1 meetings.