Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Nathan Trouve vs Spencer JohnsonPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Nathan Trouve and Spencer Johnson have met 1 time since 2026; Spencer Johnson leads 1–0. Across all meetings Trouve has taken 0 sets to Johnson's 2. Their most recent meeting: Spencer Johnson won at M15 Los Angeles (2026).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months

IndicatorTrouveJohnson
Wins in straight sets75%82%
Wins a set when losing14%45%
Goes to a deciding set18%24%
Covers βˆ’1.5 sets as favorite33%66%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog25%80%
Tiebreak sets won33%63%
Wins after taking set 175%95%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 175%82%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Trouve 0, Johnson 1).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Trouve

πŸͺƒ Counterpuncher

Elite BP conversionStrong return gameDefensive consistencyRally tolerance
vs

Johnson

πŸ’₯ Big Hitter

Power groundstrokesHigh winner countAggressive shotsShort rallies

Matchup analysis

πŸͺƒ Counterpuncher vs πŸ’₯ Big Hitter is historically tight (48% vs 52%, 3,969 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and the head-to-head matter most.

Previous meetings

1 career meeting, newest first

Jun 12, 2026

M15 Los Angeles

H Hard Β· Quarterfinals

647
46
Johnson

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days

MetricTrouveJohnson
W-L-9–6
Avg odds-1.54
ROI %--10.8%
Units P/L--1.62u

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricTrouveJohnson
Countriesβ€”1
Eventsβ€”1
Matchesβ€”3
Distanceβ€”0 mi Β· 0 km
Routeβ€”USA

Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Common opponents

Results vs. opponents both players faced Β· Last 12 months

Across 1 shared opponent, both Trouve and Johnson posted a 100% win rate.

OpponentTrouveJohnson
Strong Kirchheimer
W
36
63
76
W
75
63

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Trouve
LWWWWLLW
L

Spencer Johnson

M15 Los Angeles Β· Quarterfinals

647
46

Jun 12

W

Marcel Latak

M15 Los Angeles Β· 2nd Round

61
64

Jun 11

W

Strong Kirchheimer

M15 Los Angeles Β· 1st Round

36
63
764

Jun 10

W

Reece Falck

M15 Los Angeles Β· 3rd Round Qualifying

60
64

Jun 9

W

Niels Peter Van Noord

M15 Los Angeles Β· 1st Round Qualifying

Jun 8

L

Marko Mesarovic

Futures 2026

36
36

May 26

L

Marko Mesarovic

M15 Lakewood Β· 3rd Round Qualifying

36
36

May 26

W

Diogo Morais

M15 Lakewood Β· 1st Round Qualifying

61
64

May 25

Johnson
LWWLWLLW
L

Tristan Boyer

San Diego 2 Challenger Β· 1st Round

647
16

Sep 22

W

Jakub Vrba

San Diego 2 Challenger Β· 3rd Round Qualifying

62
64

Sep 21

W

Jan Kobierski

San Diego 2 Challenger Β· 1st Round Qualifying

763
63

Sep 20

L

Erik Arutiunian

Tiburon Challenger Β· 3rd Round Qualifying

647
667

Sep 14

W

Vignesh Gogineni

Tiburon Challenger Β· 1st Round Qualifying

61
667
61

Sep 13

L

Cristian Garin

U.S. Open - New York Β· 1st Round Qualifying

657
64
67

Aug 24

L

Andre Ilagan

Lexington Challenger Β· Semifinals

46
46

Aug 8

W

Jay Dylan Hara Friend

Lexington Challenger Β· 2nd Round

63
60

Aug 7

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 11–50 matches

MetricTrouveJohnson
Matches won36%78%
Sets won38%74%
Games won46%58%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageTrouveJohnson
ITF M1501

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceTrouveJohnson
Hard01

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Nathan Trouve vs Spencer Johnson FAQ

Spencer Johnson leads the head-to-head 1–0 over 1 meetings.