Nathan Ponwith vs Preston StearnsPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
πΊπΈNathan Ponwith
#1468 Β· 28 yrs Β· R
2 meetings Β· sets 1β4
πΊπΈPreston Stearns
#1326 Β· 22 yrs Β· L
Nathan Ponwith and Preston Stearns have met 2 times since 2023; Preston Stearns leads 2β0. Their first meeting came at Columbus 2 in 2023 on hard. On hard courts Stearns leads 2β0. Stearns has won the last 2 meetings. Across all meetings Ponwith has taken 1 sets to Stearns's 4. Their most recent meeting: Preston Stearns won at M25 Columbus 1 (2025).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months
| Indicator | Ponwith | Stearns | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Nathan Ponwith | Preston Stearns | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 57% | 4/7 | 75% | 6/8 |
| Wins a set when losing | 20% | 2/10 | 50% | 2/4 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 29% | 5/17 | 33% | 4/12 |
| Covers β1.5 sets as favorite | 50% | 2/4 | 100% | 2/2 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 30% | 3/10 | 83% | 5/6 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 20% | 1/5 | 44% | 4/9 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 67% | 4/6 | 89% | 8/9 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 67% | 4/6 | 67% | 6/9 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 2 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Ponwith 0, Stearns 1).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Ponwith
π Pusher
Stearns
βοΈ Grinder
Matchup analysis
The βοΈ Grinder archetype wins about 70% vs π Pusher across 41 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Preston Stearns.
Grinder players often use relentless consistency and deep court positioning to pressure the pusher's extreme retrieval.
Previous meetings
2 career meetings, newest first
Nov 11, 2025
M25 Columbus 1
H Hard Β· 1st Round
Sep 17, 2023
Columbus 2
H Hard Β· 1st Round Qualifying
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days
| Metric | Ponwith | Stearns |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 1β0 | 1β1 |
| Avg odds | 1.40 | 2.38 |
| ROI % | +40.0% | +14.5% |
| Units P/L | +0.40u | +0.29u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Ponwith | Stearns |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 1 | 1 |
| Events | 1 | 1 |
| Matches | 2 | 5 |
| Distance | β | β |
| Route | USA | USA |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Oliver Okonkwo
M15 Champaign Β· 2nd Round
Aug 27
David Bakonyi
M15 Champaign Β· 1st Round
Aug 26
Branko Djuric
M25 Bakersfield 1 Β· 2nd Round
Mar 19
Jacob Brumm
M25 Bakersfield 1 Β· 1st Round
Mar 18
Stefan Kozlov
Arizona Tennis Classic Β· 1st Round Qualifying
Mar 9
Robert Strombachs
M25 San Jose 1 Β· 2nd Round
Feb 18
Niccolo Catini
M25 San Jose 1 Β· 1st Round
Feb 17
Natan Rodrigues
M15 Huamantla 2 Β· Quarterfinals
Feb 6
Bryce Nakashima
M15 Champaign Β· Semifinals
Aug 29
Marko Mesarovic
M15 Champaign Β· Quarterfinals
Aug 28
Joshua Peck
M15 Champaign Β· 2nd Round
Aug 27
Joshua Peck
M15 Champaign Β· 2nd Round
Aug 27
Noa Vukadin
M15 Champaign Β· 1st Round
Aug 26
Jack Anthrop
M25 Columbus 1 Β· Quarterfinals
Nov 14
Marko Mesarovic
M25 Columbus 1 Β· 2nd Round
Nov 13
Marko Mesarovic
M25 Columbus OH Β· Round of 16
Nov 13
Rivalry momentum
Cumulative head-to-head lead over time
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 12β17 matches
| Metric | Ponwith | Stearns |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 41% | 67% |
| Sets won | 41% | 64% |
| Games won | 47% | 54% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Ponwith | Stearns |
|---|---|---|
| ITF M25 | 0 | 1 |
| ATP Challenger Tour | 0 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Ponwith | Stearns |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 0 | 2 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.