Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Nathan Cox vs Neo NiednerPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Nathan Cox and Neo Niedner have met 1 time since 2026; Neo Niedner leads 1–0. Across all meetings Cox has taken 0 sets to Niedner's 2. Their most recent meeting: Neo Niedner won at M15 Irvine (2026).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months

IndicatorCoxNiedner
Wins in straight sets25%67%
Wins a set when losing50%40%
Goes to a deciding set60%36%
Covers βˆ’1.5 sets as favorite50%40%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog63%50%
Tiebreak sets won0%67%
Wins after taking set 1100%86%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 1100%57%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Cox 0, Niedner 1).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Cox

βš™οΈ Grinder

Relentless consistencyDeep court positioningHigh rally toleranceMental fortitude
vs

Niedner

βš”οΈ The Gladiator

Physical intensityBalanced gameStrong in deciding setsCompetitive fighter

Matchup analysis

βš™οΈ Grinder vs βš”οΈ The Gladiator is historically tight (52% vs 48%, 646 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and the head-to-head matter most.

Previous meetings

1 career meeting, newest first

Jun 18, 2026

M15 Irvine

H Hard Β· 2nd Round

36
657
Niedner

Prop Research

Hit rates on common betting markets Β· Last 90 days

OutcomeCoxNiedner
1 or more88%50%
3 or more25%10%
5 or more13%0%
10 or more0%0%
15 or more0%0%
20 or more0%0%

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days

MetricCoxNiedner
W-L3–55–4
Avg odds2.742.01
ROI %-48.4%-2.0%
Units P/L-3.87u-0.18u

Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricCoxNiedner
Countries11
Events11
Matches22
Distanceβ€”β€”
RoutePARGER

Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Cox
LWLWLWLL
L

Joaquin Aguilar Cardozo

M15 Asuncion Β· 2nd Round

16
46

Aug 19

W

Bautista De La Pena

M15 Asuncion Β· 1st Round

657
63
61

Aug 18

L

Axel Nefve

M15 Rochester Β· 2nd Round

46
46

Jul 16

W

Zac Hamill

M15 Rochester Β· 1st Round

60
61

Jul 15

L

Neo Niedner

M15 Irvine Β· 2nd Round

36
657

Jun 18

W

Aadarsh Tripathi

M15 Irvine Β· 1st Round

607
61
63

Jun 17

L

Noah Zamora

M15 Los Angeles Β· 1st Round

06
64
26

Jun 10

L

Justin Roberts

M15 Lakewood Β· 1st Round

36
63
657

Jun 3

Niedner
LWLWLLWW
L

Vincent Dullinger

M15 Frankfurt Β· 2nd Round

57
26

Aug 6

W

Tom Zeuch

M15 Frankfurt Β· 1st Round

64
46
63

Aug 4

L

Tom Sickenberger

M25 Wetzlar Β· 2nd Round

64
36
667

Jul 30

W

Kaspar Mathes

M25 Wetzlar Β· 1st Round

63
36
62

Jul 29

L

Jonas Kucera

M15 Uslar Β· 1st Round

06
61
26

Jul 15

L

Spencer Johnson

M15 Irvine Β· Quarterfinals

36
57

Jun 19

W

Nathan Cox

M15 Irvine Β· 2nd Round

63
765

Jun 18

W

Matt Kuhar

M15 Irvine Β· 1st Round

64
63

Jun 17

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 10–11 matches

MetricCoxNiedner
Matches won40%55%
Sets won42%54%
Games won49%51%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageCoxNiedner
ITF M1501

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceCoxNiedner
Hard01

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Nathan Cox vs Neo Niedner FAQ

Neo Niedner leads the head-to-head 1–0 over 1 meetings.