Mia Slama vs Yi Chi MaPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Mia Slama and Yi Chi Ma have met 1 time since 2026; Yi Chi Ma leads 1–0. Across all meetings Slama has taken 0 sets to Ma's 2. Their most recent meeting: Yi Chi Ma won at W100 Cary (2026).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Slama | Chi Ma | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Mia Slama | Yi Chi Ma | ||
| Wins in straight sets | 83% | 10/12 | 86% | 18/21 |
| Wins a set when losing | 18% | 2/11 | 13% | 2/16 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 17% | 4/23 | 14% | 5/37 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | 78% | 7/9 | 17% | 1/6 |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 30% | 3/10 | 50% | 2/4 |
| Tiebreak sets won | 33% | 1/3 | 58% | 7/12 |
| Wins after taking set 1 | 86% | 12/14 | 100% | 19/19 |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | 71% | 10/14 | 95% | 18/19 |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Slama 0, Chi Ma 1).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Slama
👑 The Complete Package
Ma
💥 Big Hitter
Matchup analysis
👑 The Complete Package vs 💥 Big Hitter is historically tight (52% vs 48%, 4,271 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and the head-to-head matter most.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Jul 3, 2026
W100 Cary
H Hard · Quarterfinals
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Slama | Ma |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 2–2 | - |
| Avg odds | 2.55 | - |
| ROI % | -46.3% | - |
| Units P/L | -1.85u | - |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Slama | Ma |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 1 | — |
| Events | 1 | — |
| Matches | 3 | — |
| Distance | — | — |
| Route | UKR | — |
Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Across 1 shared opponent, both Slama and Ma posted a 0% win rate.
| Opponent | Slama | Ma |
|---|---|---|
| Francoise Abanda | L 64 46 16 | L 26 62 46 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Lucciana Perez Alarcon
W50 Lexington · 1st Round
Oct 7
Jensen Diianni
W50 Lexington · 3rd Round Qualifying
Oct 6
Kate Sharabura
W50 Lexington · 1st Round Qualifying
Oct 6
Gloriana Nahum
W35 Southaven · 1st Round Qualifying
Aug 3
Malaika Rapolu
W75 Lexington · 1st Round
Jul 29
Kylie Collins
W75 Granby · 1st Round
Jul 15
Sachia Vickery
W75 Granby · 3rd Round Qualifying
Jul 13
Anastasia Malysheva
W75 Granby · 1st Round Qualifying
Jul 12
Rachel Gailis
W35 Dallas · 2nd Round
Jul 16
Theadora Rabman
W35 Dallas · 1st Round
Jul 15
Francoise Abanda
W50 Columbus · 1st Round
Jul 8
Lucrezia Stefanini
W100 Cary · Semifinals
Jul 4
Mia Slama
W100 Cary · Quarterfinals
Jul 3
Momoko Kobori
W100 Cary · 2nd Round
Jul 2
Reese Brantmeier
W100 Cary · 1st Round
Jun 30
Sonja Zhiyenbayeva
W100 Wuning · 1st Round
Jun 9
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 23–37 matches
| Metric | Slama | Ma |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 52% | 57% |
| Sets won | 52% | 56% |
| Games won | 53% | 52% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Slama | Ma |
|---|---|---|
| ITF W100 | 0 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Slama | Ma |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 0 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.