Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Maxim Zhukov vs Thijmen LoofPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Maxim Zhukov and Thijmen Loof have met 1 time since 2026; Thijmen Loof leads 1–0. Across all meetings Zhukov has taken 1 sets to Loof's 2. Their most recent meeting: Thijmen Loof won at Guangzhou Challenger (2026).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months

IndicatorZhukovLoof
Wins in straight sets55%50%
Wins a set when losing43%50%
Goes to a deciding set44%50%
Covers −1.5 sets as favorite39%0%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog40%86%
Tiebreak sets won43%50%
Wins after taking set 184%75%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 163%50%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample — read with care. Head-to-head: 0 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Zhukov 0, Loof 0).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Zhukov

🪃 Counterpuncher

Elite BP conversionStrong return gameDefensive consistencyRally tolerance
vs

Loof

🤖 Servebot

High ace rateDominant serviceWeaker returnBig first serve

Matchup analysis

The 🤖 Servebot archetype wins about 55% vs 🪃 Counterpuncher across 3,438 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Thijmen Loof.

Servebot players often use high ace rate and dominant service to pressure the counterpuncher's elite bp conversion.

Previous meetings

1 career meeting, newest first

Sep 13, 2026

Guangzhou Challenger

H Hard · 1st Round Qualifying

637
75
36
Loof

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days

MetricZhukovLoof
W-L1–42–2
Avg odds2.073.05
ROI %-65.5%+49.8%
Units P/L-3.27u+1.99u

Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricZhukovLoof
Countries—1
Events—1
Matches—1
Distance—0 mi · 0 km
Route—CHN

Host country from each tournament in the last 30 days, including the current event even when a player arrived on a bye. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Zhukov
LWLLLLLW
L

Ryan Seggerman

Wuning 3 Challenger · 3rd Round Qualifying

765
16
26

Oct 5

W

Egor Agafonov

Wuning 3 Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying

Oct 4

L

Thijmen Loof

Guangzhou Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying

637
75
36

Sep 13

L

Samir Hamza Reguig

Istanbul Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying

Sep 6

L

Sergey Fomin

Astana Challenger · 1st Round

Aug 11

L

Kerem Yilmaz

Istanbul Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying

617
763
26

Aug 2

L

Matthew Dellavedova

M15 Maanshan 4 · Final

16
46

Mar 29

W

Fitriadi M Rifqi

M15 Maanshan 4 · Semifinals

63
61

Mar 28

Loof
LWLWLLWL
L

Jesse Delaney

Guangzhou Challenger · 3rd Round Qualifying

46
36

Sep 14

W

Maxim Zhukov

Guangzhou Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying

763
57
63

Sep 13

L

Mitsuki Wei Kang Leong

Shanghai Challenger · 3rd Round Qualifying

Sep 7

W

Uisung Park

Shanghai Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying

63
64

Sep 6

L

Juan Pablo Ficovich

Libema Open - 's-Hertogenbosch · 1st Round Qualifying

637
64
26

Jun 6

L

Ivan Marrero Curbelo

Banorte Tennis Open · 2nd Round Qualifying

75
36
57

Mar 30

W

Samuel Alejandro Linde Palacios

San Luis Potosi Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying

762
64

Mar 29

L

Michael Vrbensky

Yokohama · 2nd Round Qualifying

36
36

Nov 17

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 8–36 matches

MetricZhukovLoof
Matches won61%50%
Sets won57%50%
Games won53%50%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageZhukovLoof
ATP Challenger Tour01

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceZhukovLoof
Hard01

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Maxim Zhukov vs Thijmen Loof FAQ

Thijmen Loof leads the head-to-head 1–0 over 1 meetings.