Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Max Hans Rehberg vs Noah ThurnerPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Max Hans Rehberg and Noah Thurner have met 1 time since 2026; Max Hans Rehberg leads 1–0. Across all meetings Rehberg has taken 2 sets to Thurner's 0. Their most recent meeting: Max Hans Rehberg won at M25 Trimbach 1 (2026).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months

IndicatorHans RehbergThurner
Wins in straight sets81%75%
Wins a set when losing48%18%
Goes to a deciding set29%19%
Covers −1.5 sets as favorite38%33%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog75%29%
Tiebreak sets won38%14%
Wins after taking set 191%50%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 177%50%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Hans Rehberg 1, Thurner 0).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Rehberg

🏹 Frontrunner

Fast startsAggressive openersMomentum-drivenStrong holds
vs

Thurner

⚙️ Grinder

Relentless consistencyDeep court positioningHigh rally toleranceMental fortitude

Matchup analysis

🏹 Frontrunner vs ⚙️ Grinder is historically tight (52% vs 48%, 279 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and the head-to-head matter most.

Previous meetings

1 career meeting, newest first

Mar 3, 2026

M25 Trimbach 1

? Carpet · 1st Round

64
64
Rehberg

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days

MetricRehbergThurner
W-L8–60–2
Avg odds1.564.20
ROI %-15.3%-100.0%
Units P/L-2.14u-2.00u

Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricRehbergThurner
Countries21
Events31
Matches51
Distance503 mi · 810 km
RouteGER → CZE → GERBEL

Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Common opponents

Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months

Rehberg has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Thurner's 67%).

OpponentRehbergThurner
Gregoire Delattre
W
62
61
W
76
75
Benjamin Vitter
W
63
62
W
75
63
William Rejchtman Vinciguerra
W
63
64
L
46
46

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Rehberg
LLWLWLWL
L

Facundo Mena

Augsburg Challenger · 1st Round

46
46

Aug 25

L

Filip Cristian Jianu

Prague Challenger · Quarterfinals

36
46

Aug 20

W

Kimmer Coppejans

Prague Challenger · 2nd Round

64
61

Aug 19

L

Saba Purtseladze

Hamburg Challenger · 2nd Round

16
75
57

Aug 13

W

Diego Dedura

Hamburg Challenger · 1st Round

61
64

Aug 11

L

Daniel Elahi Galan

Bonn Challenger · 2nd Round

64
637
647

Jul 30

W

Stefano Travaglia

Bonn Challenger · 1st Round

63
61

Jul 28

L

Marc-Andrea Huesler

Zug Challenger · Semifinals

657
64
46

Jul 25

Thurner
LLLLLLWW
L

Stijn Paardekooper

M15 Lambermont · 1st Round

36
16

Aug 19

L

Tom Zeuch

M25 Koszalin · 1st Round

46
46

Jul 28

L

Federico Coria

Bundesliga - men

46
26

Jul 10

L

Lorenzo Bocchi

M15 Altamura 1 · 1st Round

26
26

Mar 25

L

Max Hans Rehberg

M25 Trimbach 1 · 1st Round

46
46

Mar 3

L

Rocco Piatti

M15 Zahra 2 · Quarterfinals

62
46
677

Feb 6

W

Ali Habib

M15 Zahra 2 · 2nd Round

762
75

Feb 5

W

Robert Guna

M15 Zahra 2 · 1st Round

36
64
64

Feb 3

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 21–63 matches

MetricRehbergThurner
Matches won67%19%
Sets won65%24%
Games won57%43%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageRehbergThurner
ITF M2510

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceRehbergThurner
Carpet10

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Max Hans Rehberg vs Noah Thurner FAQ

Max Hans Rehberg leads the head-to-head 1–0 over 1 meetings.