Matthew Mendez vs Strong KirchheimerPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Matthew Mendez and Strong Kirchheimer have met 1 time since 2016; Strong Kirchheimer leads 1–0. Across all meetings Mendez has taken 0 sets to Kirchheimer's 2. Their most recent meeting: Strong Kirchheimer won at Columbus 2 (2016).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Mendez | Kirchheimer | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Matthew Mendez | Strong Kirchheimer | ||
| Wins in straight sets | — | 56% | 15/27 | |
| Wins a set when losing | 0% | 0/1 | 31% | 9/29 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 0% | 0/1 | 38% | 21/56 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | — | 47% | 9/19 | |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 0% | 0/1 | 48% | 13/27 |
| Tiebreak sets won | — | 38% | 10/26 | |
| Wins after taking set 1 | — | 80% | 20/25 | |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | — | 60% | 15/25 | |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample — read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Mendez 0, Kirchheimer 1).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Mendez
⚙️ Grinder
Kirchheimer
🎾 All-Court
Matchup analysis
The 🎾 All-Court archetype wins about 54% vs ⚙️ Grinder across 143 matches in our dataset: a stylistic lean toward Strong Kirchheimer.
All-Court players often use tactical versatility and net approach ability to pressure the grinder's relentless consistency.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Nov 2, 2016
Columbus 2
H Hard · 1st Round Qualifying
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Mendez | Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–1 | 0–2 |
| Avg odds | 8.48 | 2.86 |
| ROI % | -100.0% | -100.0% |
| Units P/L | -1.00u | -2.00u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Common opponents
Results vs. opponents both players faced · Last 12 months
Kirchheimer has a higher win rate against shared opponents (100% vs Mendez's 0%).
| Opponent | Mendez | Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| Tomas Luna | L 67 64 810 | W 64 64 |
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Tomas Luna
M15 Asuncion · 1st Round Qualifying
Aug 16
Dakotah Bobo
M15 Asuncion · 1st Round
Aug 11
Matthew Barton
Columbus · 2nd Round Qualifying
Sep 2
Strong Kirchheimer
Columbus 2 · 1st Round Qualifying
Nov 2
Hugo Di Feo
Columbus · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 1
Alexander Ikenna Okonkwo
M25 East Lansing · 1st Round
Aug 12
Tyler Zink
Lexington Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Aug 2
Enzo Aguiard
Winnipeg Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Jul 19
Philip Sekulic
Granby Challenger · 1st Round
Jul 14
Edward Winter
Granby Challenger · 3rd Round Qualifying
Jul 13
Kody Pearson
Granby Challenger · 1st Round Qualifying
Jul 12
Jay Dylan Hara Friend
M25 Laval · Quarterfinals
Jul 10
Tristan Stringer
Futures 2026
Jul 10
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 1–56 matches
| Metric | Mendez | Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 0% | 48% |
| Sets won | 0% | 47% |
| Games won | 20% | 50% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Mendez | Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Challenger Tour | 0 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Mendez | Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 0 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.