Matthew Mendez vs Strong KirchheimerPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats
Matthew Mendez and Strong Kirchheimer have met 1 time since 2016; Strong Kirchheimer leads 1–0. Across all meetings Mendez has taken 0 sets to Kirchheimer's 2. Their most recent meeting: Strong Kirchheimer won at Columbus 2 (2016).
Spread & Straight-Sets Form
Completed best-of-3 matches · Last 12 months
| Indicator | Mendez | Kirchheimer | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indicator | Matthew Mendez | Strong Kirchheimer | ||
| Wins in straight sets | — | 55% | 17/31 | |
| Wins a set when losing | 0% | 0/1 | 28% | 9/32 |
| Goes to a deciding set | 0% | 0/1 | 37% | 23/63 |
| Covers −1.5 sets as favorite | — | 38% | 8/21 | |
| Covers +1.5 sets as underdog | 0% | 0/1 | 47% | 14/30 |
| Tiebreak sets won | — | 46% | 12/26 | |
| Wins after taking set 1 | — | 82% | 23/28 | |
| Wins 2-0 after taking set 1 | — | 61% | 17/28 | |
Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Small sample — read with care. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Mendez 0, Kirchheimer 1).
Style Matchup
Playing styles and historical archetype record
Mendez
⚙️ Grinder
Kirchheimer
⚙️ Grinder
Matchup analysis
Both Matthew Mendez and Strong Kirchheimer are ⚙️ Grinder types. Mirror matchups usually come down to execution, fitness, and surface fit, across 654 matches in our dataset the historical split is about even.
Previous meetings
1 career meeting, newest first
Nov 2, 2016
Columbus 2
H Hard · 1st Round Qualifying
Player ROI
Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches · Last 90 days
| Metric | Mendez | Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| W-L | 0–1 | 8–4 |
| Avg odds | 8.48 | 2.05 |
| ROI % | -100.0% | -0.3% |
| Units P/L | -1.00u | -0.03u |
Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.
Travel
Last 30 days
| Metric | Mendez | Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| Countries | 1 | — |
| Events | 1 | — |
| Matches | 1 | — |
| Distance | — | — |
| Route | PAR | — |
Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.
Recent Form
Last five matches per player
Dakotah Bobo
M15 Asuncion · 1st Round
Aug 11
Matthew Barton
Columbus · 2nd Round Qualifying
Sep 2
Strong Kirchheimer
Columbus 2 · 1st Round Qualifying
Nov 2
Hugo Di Feo
Columbus · 1st Round Qualifying
Sep 1
Philip Sekulic
Granby Challenger · 1st Round
Jul 14
Edward Winter
Granby challenger
Jul 13
Kody Pearson
Granby challenger
Jul 12
Jay Friend
M25 Laval · Quarterfinals
Jul 11
Tristan Stringer
Futures 2026
Jul 10
Miko Lapalme
M25 Laval · 1st Round
Jul 9
Tristan Stringer
M25 Laval · 2nd Round
Jul 9
Miko Lapalme
Futures 2026
Jul 9
Win rate
Matches, sets and games won · Last 12 months · 1–63 matches
| Metric | Mendez | Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| Matches won | 0% | 49% |
| Sets won | 0% | 48% |
| Games won | 20% | 50% |
Record by tier
Head-to-head record by tournament tier
| Stage | Mendez | Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| ATP Challenger Tour | 0 | 1 |
By surface
Head-to-head record per surface
| Surface | Mendez | Kirchheimer |
|---|---|---|
| Hard | 0 | 1 |
Share this matchup
Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.