Smashrssmashrs.

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

Head-to-Head

Matthew Forbes vs Trevor SvajdaPrediction, Head-to-Head Results, and Stats

Matthew Forbes and Trevor Svajda have met 1 time since 2026; Trevor Svajda leads 1–0. Across all meetings Forbes has taken 0 sets to Svajda's 2. Their most recent meeting: Trevor Svajda won at M25 Dallas (2026).

Spread & Straight-Sets Form

Completed best-of-3 matches Β· Last 12 months

IndicatorForbesSvajda
Wins in straight sets46%57%
Wins a set when losing14%18%
Goes to a deciding set40%32%
Covers βˆ’1.5 sets as favorite40%40%
Covers +1.5 sets as underdog64%50%
Tiebreak sets won22%56%
Wins after taking set 189%92%
Wins 2-0 after taking set 167%62%

Colored rows are higher-is-better: green above 50%, red below. Favorite/underdog set by book odds; cover rows count only matches with odds on record. Head-to-head: 1 of 1 completed meetings ended in straight sets (Forbes 0, Svajda 1).

Style Matchup

Playing styles and historical archetype record

Forbes

πŸ’₯ Big Hitter

Power groundstrokesHigh winner countAggressive shotsShort rallies
vs

Svajda

πŸͺƒ Counterpuncher

Elite BP conversionStrong return gameDefensive consistencyRally tolerance

Matchup analysis

πŸ’₯ Big Hitter vs πŸͺƒ Counterpuncher is historically tight (51% vs 49%, 2,363 matches). Neither style has a clear edge, so form, surface, and the head-to-head matter most.

Previous meetings

1 career meeting, newest first

Jul 10, 2026

M25 Dallas

H Hard Β· Quarterfinals

677
16
Svajda

Prop Research

Hit rates on common betting markets Β· Last 90 days

OutcomeForbesSvajda
1 or more100%100%
3 or more86%88%
5 or more57%38%
10 or more29%0%
15 or more0%0%
20 or more0%0%

Player ROI

Hypothetical if you put 1u on each player to win every one of their matches Β· Last 90 days

MetricForbesSvajda
W-L5–38–4
Avg odds2.201.68
ROI %+21.0%-13.8%
Units P/L+1.68u-1.65u

Small sample: ROI stabilizes with more matches; fewer than 10 in the window is noisy.

Travel

Last 30 days

MetricForbesSvajda
Countries1β€”
Events1β€”
Matches1β€”
Distance0 mi Β· 0 kmβ€”
RouteJAMβ€”

Host country from the tournament each match was played in, over the last 30 days. Route is the order of countries visited; consecutive stops in the same country are shown once. Distance is the great-circle total between host cities, shown only when every stop in the window is geocoded. A rough fatigue signal, not a headline stat.

Common opponents

Results vs. opponents both players faced Β· Last 12 months

Across 1 shared opponent, both Forbes and Svajda posted a 100% win rate.

OpponentForbesSvajda
Jie Cui
W
67
76
63
W
63
76

Recent Form

Last five matches per player

Forbes
LLWWWLWW
L

Aidan Mayo

Kingston 2 Challenger Β· 1st Round

57
57

Aug 25

L

Bernard Tomic

Lincoln Challenger Β· Quarterfinals

617
36

Jul 17

W

Jie Cui

Lincoln Challenger Β· 2nd Round

637
764
63

Jul 16

W

Sebastian Gorzny

Lincoln Challenger Β· 1st Round

63
46
64

Jul 14

W

Alafia Ayeni

Lincoln challenger

63
64

Jul 12

L

Trevor Svajda

M25 Dallas Β· Quarterfinals

677
16

Jul 10

W

Evan Bynoe

M25 Dallas Β· 2nd Round

63
26
60

Jul 9

W

Jie Cui

M25 Dallas Β· 1st Round

64
767

Jul 7

Svajda
LLWWWWWW
L

Jakub Mensik

Citi Open - Washington Β· 1st Round

26
765
36

Jul 28

L

Mark Lajal

Lincoln Challenger Β· 1st Round

75
657
36

Jul 15

W

Aidan Kim

M25 Dallas Β· Final

63
62

Jul 12

W

Evan Zhu

M25 Dallas Β· Semifinals

64
64

Jul 11

W

Matthew Forbes

M25 Dallas Β· Quarterfinals

767
61

Jul 10

W

Andreja Petrovic

Futures 2026

61
26
64

Jul 9

W

Andreja Petrovic

M25 Dallas Β· 2nd Round

61
26
64

Jul 9

W

Maximus Dussault

Futures 2026

61
46
75

Jul 8

Win rate

Matches, sets and games won Β· Last 12 months Β· 20–25 matches

MetricForbesSvajda
Matches won65%56%
Sets won56%52%
Games won53%51%

Record by tier

Head-to-head record by tournament tier

StageForbesSvajda
ITF M2501

By surface

Head-to-head record per surface

SurfaceForbesSvajda
Hard01

Share this matchup

Copy the link to paste in Discord or group chats.

Matthew Forbes vs Trevor Svajda FAQ

Trevor Svajda leads the head-to-head 1–0 over 1 meetings.